Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Ethics in AI through the Practitioner's View: A Grounded Theory Literature Review (2206.09514v3)

Published 20 Jun 2022 in cs.SE

Abstract: The term ethics is widely used, explored, and debated in the context of developing AI based software systems. In recent years, numerous incidents have raised the profile of ethical issues in AI development and led to public concerns about the proliferation of AI technology in our everyday lives. But what do we know about the views and experiences of those who develop these systems -- the AI practitioners? We conducted a grounded theory literature review (GTLR) of 38 primary empirical studies that included AI practitioners' views on ethics in AI and analysed them to derive five categories: practitioner awareness, perception, need, challenge, and approach. These are underpinned by multiple codes and concepts that we explain with evidence from the included studies. We present a taxonomy of ethics in AI from practitioners' viewpoints to assist AI practitioners in identifying and understanding the different aspects of AI ethics. The taxonomy provides a landscape view of the key aspects that concern AI practitioners when it comes to ethics in AI. We also share an agenda for future research studies and recommendations for practitioners, managers, and organisations to help in their efforts to better consider and implement ethics in AI.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. (2019) AI ethics guidelines global inventory. URL https://inventory.algorithmwatch.org/about, accessed 10 August 2022
  2. (2020) How dutch activists got an invasive fraud detection algorithm banned. URL https://algorithmwatch.org/en/syri-netherlands-algorithm/, accessed 22 August 2023
  3. (2021) 193 countries adopt first-ever global agreement on the ethics of artificial intelligence. URL https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/11/1106612, accessed 26 September 2023
  4. (2023) Australia’s ai ethics principles. URL https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-framework/australias-ai-ethics-principles, accessed 2 October 2023
  5. Al-Kaswan A, Izadi M (2023) The (ab) use of open source code to train large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:230213681
  6. Anderson M, Anderson SL (2011) Machine ethics. Cambridge University Press
  7. Van den Bergh J, Deschoolmeester D (2010) Ethical decision making in ict: discussing the impact of an ethical code of conduct. Communications of the IBIMA pp 1–10
  8. Charmaz K (2000) Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. Handbook of qualitative research 2(1):509–535
  9. Commission E (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy ai. URL https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai, accessed 2 February 2024
  10. Dastin J (2018) Amazon scraps secret ai recruiting tool that showed bias against women. URL https://www.reuters.com/, accessed 22 August 2023
  11. Defense (2020) Dod adopts 5 principles of artificial intelligence ethics. URL https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/article/article/2094085/dod-adopts-5-principles-of-artificial-intelligence-ethics/, accessed 5 February 2024
  12. Glaser BG (1978) Theoretical sensitivity. University of California,
  13. Goulding C (1998) Grounded theory: the missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda. Qualitative Market Research: an international journal 1(1):50–57
  14. Hagendorff T (2020) The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines 30(1):99–120, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
  15. Hall D (2009) The ethical software engineer. IEEE Software 26(4):9–10
  16. Harrington SJ (1996) The effect of codes of ethics and personal denial of responsibility on computer abuse judgments and intentions. MIS quarterly pp 257–278
  17. Hoda R (2021) Socio-technical grounded theory for software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48(10):1–1, DOI 10.1109/TSE.2021.3106280
  18. Kazim E, Koshiyama AS (2021) A high-level overview of ai ethics. Patterns 2(9)
  19. Kelley S (2021) Employee perceptions of effective AI principle adoption. AI Principle Adoption & Implementation
  20. Kessing M (2021) Fairness in AI: Discussion of a unified approach to ensure responsible AI development. Master dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
  21. Mittelstadt B (2019) Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence 1(11):501–507, DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4
  22. Nalini B (2020) The hitchhiker’s guide to AI ethics. URL https://towardsdatascience.com/ethics-of-ai-a-comprehensive-primer, accessed 15 July 2022
  23. OECD (2019) Oecd ai principles overview. URL https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles, accessed 5 February 2024
  24. Payne D, Landry BJ (2006) A uniform code of ethics: Business and it professional ethics. Communications of the ACM 49(11):81–84
  25. Seah J, Findlay M (2021) Communicating ethics across the AI ecosystem. SMU Centre for AI & Data Governance Research Paper (7)
  26. Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications
  27. Vainio-Pekka H (2020) The role of explainable AI in the research field of AI ethics: Systematic mapping study. Master dissertation, University of Jyväskylä
  28. Varanasi RA, Goyal N (2023) “it is currently hodgepodge”: Examining ai/ml practitioners’ challenges during co-production of responsible ai values. In: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 1–17
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Aastha Pant (7 papers)
  2. Rashina Hoda (37 papers)
  3. Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn (49 papers)
  4. Burak Turhan (28 papers)
Citations (4)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com