Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

WHIS: Hearing impairment simulator based on the gammachirp auditory filterbank (2206.06604v2)

Published 14 Jun 2022 in cs.SD and eess.AS

Abstract: A new version of a hearing impairment simulator (WHIS) was implemented based on a revised version of the gammachirp filterbank (GCFB), which incorporates fast frame-based processing, absolute threshold (AT), an audiogram of a hearing-impaired (HI) listener, and a parameter to control the cochlear input-output (IO) function. The parameter referred to as the compression health $\alpha$ controlled the slope of the IO function to range from normal hearing (NH) listeners to HI listeners, without largely changing the total hearing loss (HL). The new WHIS was designed provide an NH listener the same EPs as those of a target HI listener.The analysis part of WHIS was almost the same as that of the revised GCFB, except that the IO function was used instead of the gain function. We proposed two synthesis methods: a direct time-varying filter for perceptually small distortion and a filterbank analysis-synthesis for further HI simulations including temporal smearing. We evaluated the WHIS family and a Cambridge version of the HL simulator (CamHLS) in terms of differences in the IO function and spectral distance. The IO functions were simulated fairly well at $\alpha$ less than 0.5 but not at $\alpha$ equal to 1. Thus, it is difficult to simulate the HL when the IO function is sufficiently healthy. This is a fundamental limit of any existing HL simulator as well as WHIS. The new WHIS yielded a smaller spectral distortion than CamHLS and was fairly compatible with the previous version.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. Amano, S., Kondo, T., Sakamoto, S., and Suzuki, Y. (2007). “Ntt - tohoku university familiarity-controlled word lists 2007 (fw07)” https://doi.org/10.32130/src.FW07.
  2. ANSI/ASA  S3. 6 - 2018 (2018). “Specification for audiometers” https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/asa/ansiasas32018.
  3. Bacon, S. P., and Viemeister, N. F. (1985). “Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” Audiology 24(2), 117–134, doi: 10.3109/00206098509081545.
  4. Baer, T., and Moore, B. C. (1993). “Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94(3), 1229–1241, doi: 10.1121/1.408176.
  5. Baer, T., and Moore, B. C. (1994). “Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95(4), 2277–2280, doi: 10.1121/1.408640.
  6. Baker, R. J., and Rosen, S. (2002). “Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111(3), 1330–1339, doi: 10.1121/1.1448516.
  7. Clarity Challenge, C. (2021). “Clarity challenge” https://claritychallenge.org, (Last: 21 Apr 2022).
  8. Drullman, R., Festen, J. M., and Plomp, R. (1994). “Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95(2), 1053–1064, doi: 10.1121/1.408467.
  9. Glasberg, B. R., and Moore, B. C. (1986). “Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79(4), 1020–1033.
  10. Glasberg, B. R., and Moore, B. C. (2006). “Prediction of absolute thresholds and equal-loudness contours using a modified loudness model,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120(2), 585–588, doi: 10.1121/1.2214151.
  11. Grimault, N., Irino, T., Dimachki, S., Corneyllie, A., Patterson, R. D., and Garcia, S. (2018). “A real time hearing loss simulator,” Acta Acustica united with Acustica 104(5), 904–908, doi: 10.3813/AAA.919252.
  12. Hasegawa, J., Hashi, M., Matsui, T., and Irino, T. (2019). “Application of a hearing loss simulator to education, clinic, and research and its evaluation by speech-language-hearing therapists (in japanese),” in Proc. Japanese Assocication of Speech-Language-Hearing Therapists, pp. 1–P03–4.
  13. Hu, H., Sang, J., Lutman, M. E., and Bleeck, S. (2011). “Simulation of hearing loss using compressive gammachirp auditory filters,” in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, pp. 5428–5431.
  14. Irino, T., Fukawatase, T., Sakaguchi, M., Nisimura, R., Kawahara, H., and Patterson, R. D. (2013). “Accurate estimation of compression in simultaneous masking enables the simulation of hearing impairment for normal-hearing listeners,” in Basic Aspects of Hearing (Springer), pp. 73–80, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_9.
  15. Irino, T., and Patterson, R. D. (1997). “A time fomain, level-dependent auditory filter: the gammachirp,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101(1), 412–419, doi: 10.1121/1.417975.
  16. Irino, T., and Patterson, R. D. (2001). “A compressive gammachirp auditory filter for both physiological and psychophysical data,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109(5), 2008–2022.
  17. Irino, T., and Patterson, R. D. (2006). “A dynamic compressive gammachirp auditory filterbank.,” IEEE transactions on audio, speech, and language processing 14(6), 2222–2232, doi: 10.1109/TASL.2006.874669.
  18. Irino, T., and Patterson, R. D. (2020). “The gammachirp auditory filter and its application to speech perception,” Acoust. Sci. and Technol. 41(1), 99–107, doi: 10.1250/ast.41.99.
  19. Irino, T., Tamaru, H., and Yamamoto, A. (2022). “A new implementation of hearing impairment simulator whis and the effect of peripheral dysfunction on speech intelligibility (in japanese),” in Proc. Acoustical Society of Japan, Spring Meeting, pp. 665–668.
  20. Irino, T., and Unoki, M. (1999). “An analysis/synthesis auditory filterbank based on an iir implementation of the gammachirp,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E) 20(6), 397–406, doi: /10.1250/ast.20.397.
  21. Liberman, M. C. (2015). “Hidden hearing loss,” Scientific American 313(2), 48–53, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26046106.
  22. Matsui, T., Irino, T., Nagae, M., Kawahara, H., and Patterson, R. D. (2016). “The effect of peripheral compression on syllable perception measured with a hearing impairment simulator,” in Physiology, Psychoacoustics and Cognition in Normal and Impaired Hearing (Springer, Cham), pp. 307–314, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6.
  23. Moore, B. C., and Glasberg, B. R. (1993). “Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94(4), 2050–2062, doi: 10.1121/1.407478.
  24. Moore, B. C., Glasberg, B. R., and Baer, T. (1997). “A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness,” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 45(4), 224–240, http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=10272.
  25. Nagae, M., Irino, T., Nisimura, R., Kawahara, H., and Patterson, R. D. (2014). “Hearing impairment simulator based on compressive gammachirp filter,” in Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific, IEEE, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/APSIPA.2014.7041579.
  26. Nejime, Y., and Moore, B. C. (1997). “Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noise,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102(1), 603–615, doi: 10.1121/1.419733.
  27. Nelson, D. A., Schroder, A. C., and Wojtczak, M. (2001). “A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110(4), 2045–2064, doi: 10.1121/1.1404439.
  28. Patterson, R. D. (1976). “Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59(3), 640–654, doi: 10.1121/1.380914.
  29. Patterson, R. D., Nimmo-Smith, I., Weber, D. L., and Milroy, R. (1982). “The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72(6), 1788–1803, doi: 10.1121/1.388652.
  30. Sergeyenko, Y., Lall, K., Liberman, M. C., and Kujawa, S. G. (2013). “Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline,” Journal of Neuroscience 33(34), 13686–13694.
  31. Stone, M. A., and Moore, B. C. (1999). “Tolerable hearing aid delays. i. estimation of limits imposed by the auditory path alone using simulated hearing losses,” Ear and Hearing 20(3), 182–192, https://journals.lww.com/ear-hearing/Abstract/1999/06000/Tolerable_Hearing_Aid_Delays__I__Estimation_of.2.aspx.
  32. Tsuiki, T., Sasamori, S., Minami, Y., Ichinohe, T., Murai, K., Murai, S., and Kawashima, H. (2002). “Age effect on hearing: a study on japanese,” Audiology Japan (in Japanese) 45(3), 241–250, doi: 10.4295/audiology.45.241.
  33. Unoki, M., Irino, T., Glasberg, B., Moore, B. C., and Patterson, R. D. (2006). “Comparison of the roex and gammachirp filters as representations of the auditory filter,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120(3), 1474–1492.
  34. Villchur, E. (1974). “Simulation of the effect of recruitment on loudness relationships in speech,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 56(5), 1601–1611, doi: 10.1121/1.1903484.
Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.