Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuning (2205.14865v3)

Published 30 May 2022 in cs.CV
Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuning

Abstract: Thanks to the large pre-trained vision-LLMs (VLMs) like CLIP, we can craft a zero-shot classifier by "prompt", e.g., the confidence score of an image being "[CLASS]" can be obtained by using the VLM provided similarity measure between the image and the prompt sentence "a photo of a [CLASS]". Therefore, prompt shows a great potential for fast adaptation of VLMs to downstream tasks if we fine-tune the prompt-based similarity measure. However, we find a common failure that improper fine-tuning may not only undermine the prompt's inherent prediction for the task-related classes, but also for other classes in the VLM vocabulary. Existing methods still address this problem by using traditional anti-overfitting techniques such as early stopping and data augmentation, which lack a principled solution specific to prompt. We present Prompt-aligned Gradient, dubbed ProGrad, to prevent prompt tuning from forgetting the the general knowledge learned from VLMs. In particular, ProGrad only updates the prompt whose gradient is aligned (or non-conflicting) to the "general direction", which is represented as the gradient of the KL loss of the pre-defined prompt prediction. Extensive experiments demonstrate the stronger few-shot generalization ability of ProGrad over state-of-the-art prompt tuning methods. Codes are available at https://github.com/BeierZhu/Prompt-align.

An Insightful Analysis of "Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuning"

The research paper titled "Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuning" by Beier Zhu et al., presents a novel approach named Prompt-aligned Gradient (ProGrad) specifically designed for prompt tuning in vision-LLMs (VLMs). This work identifies and addresses the common pitfalls of overfitting in existing prompt tuning methodologies, which frequently rely on traditional techniques like early stopping and data augmentation to mitigate performance degradation when fine-tuning with few-shot samples.

Summary of the Approach

The research introduces ProGrad, a prompt tuning method that ensures the stability of few-shot learning by leveraging the general knowledge encoded in pretrained VLMs, such as CLIP. The critical innovation in ProGrad is its focus on maintaining an alignment in the optimization process between the general knowledge from pretrained models and the domain-specific knowledge acquired from the task-specific fine-tuning data. By coupling the update direction of the soft prompt with the gradient direction of pre-defined prompt predictions, ProGrad prevents updates that are potentially conflicting with the pre-learned general knowledge.

The ProGrad method involves computing two gradient components during training: the general knowledge gradient, derived from the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence comparing zero-shot and few-shot predictions, and the domain-specific gradient from cross-entropy loss with respect to the ground-truth annotations. The method then decomposes these gradients to retain updates only if they are not in conflict with the general knowledge—a critical aspect that reduces the risk of overfitting when faced with limited data.

Numerical Results and Claims

The experimental evaluation demonstrates that ProGrad outperforms existing state-of-the-art fine-tuning methods under varied settings, including few-shot learning, domain generalization, and cross-dataset transfer tasks across 11 datasets. On average, ProGrad achieves superior accuracy improvements, such as a 9.5% increase on FGVCAircraft and notable performance retention even with minimal fine-tuning samples. This indicates a significant improvement in generalization capabilities compared to other methods like CoOp and CoCoOp.

In domain generalization tasks, ProGrad consistently exceeds its counterparts across several dataset variations, showcasing enhanced robustness to distribution shifts—a common challenge in deploying machine learning models in varied real-world settings. The paper underscores an important nuance that ProGrad, by retaining a connection to the original pre-trained model's general knowledge, avoids susceptibility to overfitting biases inherent in fine-tuning with constrained datasets.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The theoretical underpinning of ProGrad contributes to the understanding of model generalization in the bridging domain between fixed prompt strategies and the flexibility of learned embeddings. Through formalized gradient alignment strategy, ProGrad mitigates knowledge forgetting which is instrumental for tasks requiring high adaptability with limited task-specific data.

Practically, the application of ProGrad in scenarios such as visual classification proves valuable for scenarios where domain adaptability with rapid deployment is crucial, such as personalized content moderation or adaptive autonomous systems. Its resilience against spurious correlations prevalent in narrow dataset distribution further accentuates its applicability across domains where robust domain generalization is a necessity.

Future Prospects

Looking forward, further exploration could delve into applying ProGrad beyond image classification, considering object detection, semantic segmentation, or other multifaceted vision-language tasks. Additionally, integrating ProGrad in the orchestration of more complex architectures or ensembles could yield further insights into optimizing prompt learning paradigms. Additionally, exploring the alignment strategies with more sophisticated knowledge distillation techniques or multilayer adaptation strategies could enhance the scalability of VLMs in real-world tasks requiring dynamic adaptability.

In conclusion, the ProGrad method introduces a principled blend of consistency and adaptability in prompt tuning, marking a substantial step toward refining the interface between pre-trained models and their specialized task implementations.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Beier Zhu (15 papers)
  2. Yulei Niu (32 papers)
  3. Yucheng Han (9 papers)
  4. Yue Wu (338 papers)
  5. Hanwang Zhang (161 papers)
Citations (204)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com