- The paper introduces NBMs, a novel scalable and interpretable model that reduces parameters and improves throughput in high-dimensional settings.
- It employs basis function decomposition to share learned functions across features, ensuring stability and efficient training compared to traditional GAMs.
- Empirical evaluations show NBMs match black-box accuracy while offering a 5×–50× reduction in parameters and 4×–7× faster throughput in practice.
An Evaluation of Neural Basis Models for Interpretability in Machine Learning
The paper "Neural Basis Models for Interpretability" addresses a significant challenge in machine learning: the interpretability of predictions from complex models such as black-box deep neural networks. Traditional methods to improve interpretability often suffer from instability and unfaithfulness. Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) have been proposed as an inherently interpretable alternative, but they face issues related to training complexity, substantial parameter requirements, and difficulties in scaling. This paper advances the field by introducing Neural Basis Models (NBMs), a novel subfamily of GAMs that utilize basis decomposition of shape functions. Through this approach, the research provides a scalable solution for interpretable machine learning while maintaining state-of-the-art accuracy, model size, and processing throughput.
Summary of Contributions
Introduction of NBMs: The core innovation presented in the paper is the development of NBMs, which transform existing GAMs by employing a small set of basis functions shared across all features. This basis decomposition allows NBMs to efficiently handle high-dimensional data, particularly when dealing with sparse features. The architecture relies on a single neural network that learns these basis functions concurrently for a given task, which is pivotal for achieving scalability without sacrificing interpretability.
Scalability: NBMs significantly reduce the number of parameters compared to traditional GAMs, especially in scenarios with a large number of features. This reduction is starkly evident in contrast with other neural-based GAMs such as Neural Additive Models (NAMs). In datasets with over ten features, NBMs achieve a parameter count reduction of between 5× and 50× compared to NAMs. Furthermore, NBMs provide 4× to 7× better throughput. For extremely large and sparse datasets, NBMs are the only interpretable models that effectively scale.
Integration of Higher-order Interactions: NBMs can incorporate pairwise feature interactions akin to GA2Ms, with only a linear increase in complexity. This contrasts with other models like EB2Ms and NA2Ms that suffer from quadratic growth in parameters, often necessitating feature selection heuristics.
Empirical Evaluation: The paper extensively evaluates NBMs across various tasks including regression, binary classification, and multi-class classification on tabular, image, and sparse datasets. NBMs overall outperform existing GAM frameworks, providing significant computational benefits while matching black-box models on accuracy in many cases.
Interpretability and Stability: A key advantage of NBMs demonstrated in this paper is their stability. The basis functions shared among features contribute to this stability, providing consistent shape function outputs even with varying random initialization during training runs. This contrasts with NAMs where increased parameters can lead to more unstable outputs for features with low data density.
Implications and Future Directions
The implications of this research extend beyond theoretical contributions to practical applications. For high-risk domains like healthcare and finance, where model interpretability is critical, NBMs can replace or complement existing black-box models, enabling practitioners to understand and trust predictions. Furthermore, this approach opens up new avenues for scalable GAMs in scenarios where traditional methods falter, such as high-dimensional and sparse data environments.
The theoretical grounding using Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces highlights the efficiency of NBMs, suggesting that as few as logD basis functions might suffice for a robust representation. This insight could guide future enhancements, ensuring models remain scalable while retaining accuracy.
Future research might explore synergy between NBMs and other interpretability techniques, especially those leveraging different machine learning paradigms for generating interpretable models. Moreover, exploring visual interpretability, potentially extending NBMs to pixel or feature spaces in computer vision, offers a promising avenue.
In conclusion, the paper makes a substantial contribution by reconciling the interpretability and scalability tensions in machine learning models, potentially catalyzing wider adoption of GAMs in large-scale, mission-critical applications.