Optimizing UAV Recharge Scheduling for Heterogeneous and Persistent Aerial Service (2205.12656v1)
Abstract: The adoption of UAVs in communication networks is becoming reality thanks to the deployment of advanced solutions for connecting UAVs and using them as communication relays. However, the use of UAVs introduces novel energy constraints and scheduling challenges in the dynamic management of network devices, due to the need to call back and recharge, or substitute, UAVs that run out of energy. In this paper, we design UAV recharging schemes under realistic assumptions on limited flight times and time consuming charging operations. Such schemes are designed to minimize the size of the fleet to be devoted to a persistent service of a set of aerial locations, hence its cost. We consider a fleet of homogeneous UAVs both under homogeneous and heterogeneous service topologies. For UAVs serving aerial locations with homogeneous distances to a recharge station, we design a simple scheduling, that we name HORR, which we prove to be feasible and optimal, in the sense that it uses the minimum possible number of UAVs to guarantee the coverage of the aerial service locations. For the case of non-evenly distributed aerial locations, we demonstrate that the problem becomes NP-hard, and design a lightweight recharging scheduling scheme, PHERR, that extends the operation of HORR to the heterogeneous case, leveraging the partitioning of the set of service locations. We show that PHERR is near-optimal because it approaches the performance limits identified through a lower bound that we formulate on the total fleet size.
- E. Arribas, V. Cholvi, and V. Mancuso, “An optimal scheme to recharge communication drones,” in IEEE GLOBECOM 2021 - IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2021.
- V. Chamola, V. Hassija, V. Gupta, and M. Guizani, “A Comprehensive review of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Role of IoT, drones, AI, blockchain, and 5G in managing its impact,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 90 225–90 265, 2020.
- I. Bor-Yaliniz, M. Salem, G. Senerath, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Is 5G ready for drones: A look into contemporary and prospective wireless networks from a standardization perspective,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2019.
- J. R. Montoya-Torres, J. López Franco, S. Nieto Isaza, H. Felizzola Jiménez, and N. Herazo-Padilla, “A literature review on the vehicle routing problem with multiple depots,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 79, pp. 115–129, 2015.
- M. Shin, J. Kim, and M. Levorato, “Auction-based charging scheduling with deep learning framework for multi-drone networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 4235–4248, 2019.
- U. Ermağan, B. Yıldız, and F. S. Salman, “A learning based algorithm for drone routing,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 137, p. 105524, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030505482100263X
- T. Addabbo, S. De Muro, G. Falaschi, A. Fort, E. Landi, R. Moretti, M. Mugnaini, F. Nicolelli, L. Parri, M. Tani, M. Tesei, and V. Vignoli, “An automatic battery recharge and condition monitoring system for autonomous drones,” in 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 IoT, 2020, pp. 1–5.
- V. Hassija, V. Chamola, D. N. G. Krishna, and M. Guizani, “A distributed framework for energy trading between uavs and charging stations for critical applications,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 5391–5402, 2020.
- T. Cokyasar, “Optimization of battery swapping infrastructure for e-commerce drone delivery,” Computer Communications, vol. 168, pp. 146–154, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140366420320211
- W. Qin, Z. Shi, W. Li, K. Li, T. Zhang, and R. Wang, “Multiobjective routing optimization of mobile charging vehicles for uav power supply guarantees,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 162, p. 107714, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835221006185
- H. Shakhatreh, A. Khreishah, J. Chakareski, H. B. Salameh, and I. Khalil, “On the continuous coverage problem for a swarm of uavs,” in 2016 IEEE 37th Sarnoff Symposium, 2016, pp. 130–135.
- E. Hartuv, N. Agmon, and S. Kraus, “Scheduling spare drones for persistent task performance under energy constraints,” in Proceedings of the 17th AAMAS International Conference, 2018, pp. 532–540.
- H. Park and J. R. Morrison, “System design and resource analysis for persistent robotic presence with multiple refueling stations,” in ICUAS, 2019, pp. 622–629.
- E. Hartuv, N. Agmon, and S. Kraus, “Spare drone optimization for persistent task performance with multiple homes,” in ICUAS, 2020, pp. 389–397.
- B. Michini, T. Toksoz, J. Redding, M. Michini, J. How, M. Vavrina, and J. Vian, “Automated battery swap and recharge to enable persistent uav missions,” in Infotech@ Aerospace 2011, 2011, p. 1405.
- Z.-N. Liu, D. Zhi-Hao Wang Leo, X.-Q. Liu, and H. Zhao, “QUADO: An autonomous recharge system for quadcopter,” 2017 IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) and IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics (RAM), IEEE, pp. 7–12.
- E. Hartuv, N. Agmon, and S. Kraus, “Scheduling spare drones for persistent task performance with several replacement stations - extended abstract,” in 2019 International Symposium on Multi-Robot and Multi-Agent Systems (MRS), 2019, pp. 95–97.
- S. Chopra and M. R. Rao, “The partition problem,” Mathematical programming, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 87–115, 1993.
- R. E. Korf, E. L. Schreiber, and M. D. Moffitt, “Optimal sequential multi-way number partitioning.” in ISAIM, 2014.