Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Proving (2205.11491v1)

Published 23 May 2022 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: We propose an online training procedure for a transformer-based automated theorem prover. Our approach leverages a new search algorithm, HyperTree Proof Search (HTPS), inspired by the recent success of AlphaZero. Our model learns from previous proof searches through online training, allowing it to generalize to domains far from the training distribution. We report detailed ablations of our pipeline's main components by studying performance on three environments of increasing complexity. In particular, we show that with HTPS alone, a model trained on annotated proofs manages to prove 65.4% of a held-out set of Metamath theorems, significantly outperforming the previous state of the art of 56.5% by GPT-f. Online training on these unproved theorems increases accuracy to 82.6%. With a similar computational budget, we improve the state of the art on the Lean-based miniF2F-curriculum dataset from 31% to 42% proving accuracy.

Citations (101)

Summary

  • The paper introduces HyperTree Proof Search (HTPS), an MCTS-inspired algorithm that efficiently expands entire proof subtrees for automated theorem proving.
  • It employs an online training procedure that continually refines transformer-based provers, significantly improving performance in environments like Metamath, Lean, and Equations.
  • The approach achieves notable results, with validation pass rates reaching 82.6% on Metamath, 58.6% on Lean, and 91.3% on the custom Equations environment.

HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Proving

The paper "HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Proving" introduces a novel approach integrating machine learning and search algorithms for automated theorem proving. Leveraging techniques inspired by AlphaZero, the authors present HyperTree Proof Search (HTPS), which is utilized alongside an online training procedure to improve the performance of transformer-based neural theorem provers. This paper focuses on enhancing both practical and theoretical aspects of automated theorem proving across multiple formal environments: Metamath, Lean, and a custom-built Equations environment.

Contributions and Methodology

The primary contributions of this research are as follows:

  • New Search Algorithm: The introduction of HTPS, a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)-inspired algorithm tailored for the asymmetric structure of proving theorems. HTPS effectively handles the peculiarities of hypergraphs, which are prevalent in theorem proving, by expanding entire proof subtrees in one operation, thus addressing the unique challenge of ensuring all subgoals of a theorem are proved.
  • Online Training Procedure: The paper proposes an online learning setup where models learn continuously from their proof search attempts. This contrasts with previous static or offline approaches, allowing the models to refine their tactic generation and improve their accuracy significantly.
  • Environment Prototyping: The researchers developed a new testing environment, Equations, to better understand and evaluate neural theorem proving. This environment simplifies certain complexities, enabling faster iteration and debugging during model development.

The methodology combines these innovations to tackle theorem proving by deploying a transformer architecture trained via online learning. The research provides an in-depth ablation of the HTPS components and validates the approach's efficacy against state-of-the-art benchmarks.

Results and Comparisons

The research results highlight that HTPS and online training provide substantial improvements in theorem proving efficacy across varied environments:

  • Metamath: The methodology achieves a significant boost, with a cumulative pass rate reaching up to 82.6% on the validation set, compared to 61% accuracy from a baseline supervised model.
  • Lean: On the Lean environment's miniF2F dataset, the approach achieves a pass@64 score of 58.6% on the validation set, showing a remarkable improvement over previous state-of-the-art methodologies.
  • Equations: The model successfully generalizes to solve 91.3% of a challenging set of equations, demonstrating considerable potential in adapting to domains beyond its initial training distribution.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of these advancements are broad, suggesting potential for integrated AI systems capable of assisting or automating mathematical proofs at scale. Beyond practical applications in formalizing existing mathematical concepts, the approach interprets new pathways for enhancing neural network-based reasoning capabilities.

The paper paves the way for future expansion in neural theorem proving through the generation of new theorems and further integration of self-play-like methodologies to bolster exploration. As the approach demonstrates strong generalization capabilities, further refinement could lead to breakthroughs in AI models' understanding and manipulation of complex logical and mathematical structures.

In summary, this research represents a step forward in the field of automated theorem proving by efficiently combining machine learning with advanced search techniques to unlock higher performance and broader applicability in logical reasoning tasks.