Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data? (2205.09911v2)

Published 20 May 2022 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and cs.DB

Abstract: Foundation Models (FMs) are models trained on large corpora of data that, at very large scale, can generalize to new tasks without any task-specific finetuning. As these models continue to grow in size, innovations continue to push the boundaries of what these models can do on language and image tasks. This paper aims to understand an underexplored area of FMs: classical data tasks like cleaning and integration. As a proof-of-concept, we cast five data cleaning and integration tasks as prompting tasks and evaluate the performance of FMs on these tasks. We find that large FMs generalize and achieve SoTA performance on data cleaning and integration tasks, even though they are not trained for these data tasks. We identify specific research challenges and opportunities that these models present, including challenges with private and domain specific data, and opportunities to make data management systems more accessible to non-experts. We make our code and experiments publicly available at: https://github.com/HazyResearch/fm_data_tasks.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Avanika Narayan (13 papers)
  2. Ines Chami (8 papers)
  3. Laurel Orr (11 papers)
  4. Simran Arora (64 papers)
  5. Christopher Ré (194 papers)
Citations (163)

Summary

  • The paper shows that GPT-3 achieves state-of-the-art performance in zero-shot data cleaning, integration, and error detection tasks.
  • The study reformulates structured data challenges as text generation problems, using prompt engineering to bypass domain-specific models.
  • Results suggest foundation models can reduce engineering overhead in data pipelines while exposing challenges like prompt sensitivity.

Analysis of "Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?"

The paper "Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?" presents an exploration of the applicability of Foundation Models (FMs) in classical data tasks such as data cleaning and integration. The paper undertakes an empirical investigation to determine if LLMs, specifically GPT-3, which have traditionally excelled in language and image tasks, can extend their utility to structured data processing tasks without substantial domain-specific adaptation.

Overview

Foundation Models are typically large-scale LLMs trained on vast corpuses of internet text. Their capacity to generalize across tasks with minimal fine-tuning has exhibited not only groundbreaking outcomes in traditional NLP benchmarks but also potential for underexplored domains like structured data management. The paper scrutinizes the zero-shot and few-shot capabilities of LLMs in performing tasks they were not explicitly designed for, such as entity matching, error detection, schema matching, data transformation, and data imputation.

Experimental Methodology

The authors constructed a series of experiments by casting structured data tasks into text generation problems, thus allowing LLMs to approach these tasks using natural language processing techniques. The paper methodically reformulates row entries from data tables into text prompts. For example, entity matching tasks are posed as questions of equivalence between two text-encoded entries. Furthermore, the researchers compare model output against state-of-the-art task-specific systems that rely heavily on bespoke architectures, domain-specific rules, or require a significant quantity of labeled data.

Results and Implications

Remarkably, the largest variant of GPT-3 (175 billion parameters) achieved state-of-the-art performance in many tasks either few-shot or zero-shot, purely through prompt engineering without parameter updates. For instance, in error detection, GPT-3 rivaled or surpassed existing machine learning models that were fully finetuned for these specific tasks. This zero-shot efficacy illustrates LLMs' encoded knowledge and suggests a shift towards models that could potentially reduce the engineering overhead traditionally required in data integration pipelines.

Despite the promising results, the challenges were also evident. The performance exhibited sensitivity to prompt structure, requiring careful crafting of input-output modification tasks and significant effort to develop effective prompt formats. Additionally, there remain limitations in handling specialized domain terms not reflected during the model’s training, which hampers performance in highly specialized data contexts.

Future Prospects and Challenges

The paper presents a clear opportunity to leverage LLMs for more efficient and less laborious data management systems, bridging gaps for users lacking deep ML expertise. Future work should focus on enhancing the robustness of these models across diverse domains, addressing concerns with bias inherent in LLMs due to skewed training data, and developing more systematic, possibly automated, ways of creating robust prompts.

Furthermore, the paper hints at the possibility of passive learning from data exhaust and real-time feedback mechanisms. The transition to using FMs in real-world data systems will demand improvements in integrating these models with existing infrastructures, managing model updates, and ensuring data privacy and security in operational environments.

The exploratory nature of this paper provides a foundational framework for further expanding the capabilities of FMs beyond traditional linguistic tasks into being versatile tools in data-driven applications across industries, marking significant theoretical and practical advancements in computing domains.

Through the proposed use-cases and insights, the research delineates a roadmap for academia and industry to harness the omnipresent firepower of FMs for automated, adaptable, and efficient data manipulation tasks.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com