Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Inducing and Using Alignments for Transition-based AMR Parsing (2205.01464v1)

Published 3 May 2022 in cs.CL

Abstract: Transition-based parsers for Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) rely on node-to-word alignments. These alignments are learned separately from parser training and require a complex pipeline of rule-based components, pre-processing, and post-processing to satisfy domain-specific constraints. Parsers also train on a point-estimate of the alignment pipeline, neglecting the uncertainty due to the inherent ambiguity of alignment. In this work we explore two avenues for overcoming these limitations. First, we propose a neural aligner for AMR that learns node-to-word alignments without relying on complex pipelines. We subsequently explore a tighter integration of aligner and parser training by considering a distribution over oracle action sequences arising from aligner uncertainty. Empirical results show this approach leads to more accurate alignments and generalization better from the AMR2.0 to AMR3.0 corpora. We attain a new state-of-the art for gold-only trained models, matching silver-trained performance without the need for beam search on AMR3.0.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Andrew Drozdov (13 papers)
  2. Jiawei Zhou (77 papers)
  3. Radu Florian (54 papers)
  4. Andrew McCallum (132 papers)
  5. Tahira Naseem (27 papers)
  6. Yoon Kim (92 papers)
  7. Ramon Fernandez Astudillo (11 papers)
Citations (26)

Summary

Insights on "Inducing and Using Alignments for Transition-based AMR Parsing"

The paper "Inducing and Using Alignments for Transition-based AMR Parsing" addresses the development and integration of more efficient neural techniques for aligning Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) parsing, a core operation in computational semantics. Traditional transition-based parsers for AMR rely heavily on node-to-word alignments. These alignments are typically obtained through a rigorous and intricate pipeline involving rule-based systems that do not generalize well to new domains, leading to performance degradation on new datasets, such as transitioning from AMR2.0 to AMR3.0.

Key Contributions

  1. Neural Aligner Proposal: The authors introduce a neural aligner model that leverages hard attention mechanisms, formulating node alignments within a sequence-to-sequence model framework. This aligner replaces the need for multi-stage pipelines by learning alignments directly from the context, incorporating pretrained embeddings, which enhances the robustness and adaptability of AMR parsing across different domains.
  2. Integration of Alignment and Parsing: The paper explores integrating alignment learning with parser training. By considering a distribution over potential actions driven by alignment uncertainty, the method enriches the parser's training process, leveraging variability in aligning nodes to words as a form of implicit regularization or as an importance sampling technique.
  3. Empirical Advancements: This approach demonstrates superior performance and achieves a state-of-the-art result for models trained solely on gold-standard data, matching the performance of models trained on silver-standard data without resorting to computationally intensive beam search techniques.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

From a theoretical standpoint, this paper reinforces the importance of probabilistic modeling in handling the inherent ambiguity and uncertainty in semantic parsing tasks. By avoiding deterministic, rule-heavy processes, the neural approach provides a more flexible and adaptable solution that could inspire subsequent transitions in semantic parsing strategies.

Practically, the reduction in preprocessing complexity while achieving high performance highlights the potential for deploying AMR parsers more broadly across varied domains without extensive manual intervention. This is particularly relevant as data types and text genres continue to evolve, necessitating parsers that can adaptively generalize without loss in accuracy or efficiency.

Future Directions

The paper suggests that further exploration could occur in blending alignment uncertainty models with data augmentation approaches to potentially enhance performance. Moreover, expanding the application of these methods beyond English to other languages could validate the versatility of this neural approach. The potential fusion of this method with graph-based semantic representations beyond AMR might also be worth investigating, considering the growing importance of transferring linguistics inference across models.

Conclusion

Overall, the paper makes a significant contribution by innovating how alignments are conceptualized and used within the AMR parsing landscape, paving the way for more streamlined and domain-agnostic semantic parsing methodologies. Notably, by achieving substantial performance without reliance on beam search, this work underscores efficiency in parsing that is both computationally economical and theoretically sound.