Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Model Reprogramming: Resource-Efficient Cross-Domain Machine Learning (2202.10629v4)

Published 22 Feb 2022 in cs.LG and cs.AI

Abstract: In data-rich domains such as vision, language, and speech, deep learning prevails to deliver high-performance task-specific models and can even learn general task-agnostic representations for efficient finetuning to downstream tasks. However, deep learning in resource-limited domains still faces multiple challenges including (i) limited data, (ii) constrained model development cost, and (iii) lack of adequate pre-trained models for effective finetuning. This paper provides an overview of model reprogramming to bridge this gap. Model reprogramming enables resource-efficient cross-domain machine learning by repurposing and reusing a well-developed pre-trained model from a source domain to solve tasks in a target domain without model finetuning, where the source and target domains can be vastly different. In many applications, model reprogramming outperforms transfer learning and training from scratch. This paper elucidates the methodology of model reprogramming, summarizes existing use cases, provides a theoretical explanation of the success of model reprogramming, and concludes with a discussion on open-ended research questions and opportunities. A list of model reprogramming studies is actively maintained and updated at https://github.com/IBM/model-reprogramming.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. K-SVD: An algorithm for designing overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Transactions on signal processing, 54(11): 4311–4322.
  2. Reprogrammable-FL: Improving Utility-Privacy Tradeoff in Federated Learning via Model Reprogramming. In First IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning.
  3. Visual prompting: Modifying pixel space to adapt pre-trained models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.17274.
  4. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258.
  5. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, 1877–1901.
  6. Visual prompting for adversarial robustness. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 1–5. IEEE.
  7. Understanding and Improving Visual Prompting: A Label-Mapping Perspective. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.
  8. Adversarial Reprogramming of Pretrained Neural Networks for Fraud Detection. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 2935–2939.
  9. The UCR time series archive. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 6(6): 1293–1305.
  10. Improved Input Reprogramming for GAN Conditioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.02692.
  11. Adversarial Reprogramming of Neural Networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  12. WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgramming. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), 4921–4933. Online: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  13. Low-Resource Music Genre Classification with Cross-Modal Neural Model Reprogramming. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 1–5. IEEE.
  14. A survey on contrastive self-supervised learning. Technologies, 9(1): 2.
  15. Deep Graph Reprogramming. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 24345–24354.
  16. An Improved (Adversarial) Reprogramming Technique for Neural Networks. In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 3–15. Springer.
  17. Reprogramming GANs via input noise design. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 256–271. Springer.
  18. Exploring the Benefits of Visual Prompting in Differential Privacy. International Conference on Computer Vision.
  19. A Primer on Zeroth-Order Optimization in Signal Processing and Machine Learning. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.
  20. Pretrained transformers as universal computation engines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.05247, 1.
  21. Reprogramming Pretrained Language Models for Antibody Sequence Infilling. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 24398–24419. PMLR.
  22. Cross-modal Adversarial Reprogramming. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2427–2435.
  23. Adversarial Reprogramming of Text Classification Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP).
  24. Adversarial Reprogramming of Neural Cellular Automata. Distill, 6(5): e00027–004.
  25. NeuralFuse: Learning to Improve the Accuracy of Access-Limited Neural Network Inference in Low-Voltage Regimes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.16869.
  26. Neural Clamping: Joint Input Perturbation and Temperature Scaling for Neural Network Calibration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11604.
  27. Transfer learning without knowing: Reprogramming black-box machine learning models with scarce data and limited resources. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 9614–9624.
  28. Reprogramming Pretrained Language Models for Protein Sequence Representation Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.02120.
  29. Towards Efficient Task-Driven Model Reprogramming with Foundation Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02263.
  30. Voice2Series: Reprogramming Acoustic Models for Time Series Classification. In International Conference on Machine Learning.
  31. Neural model reprogramming with similarity based mapping for low-resource spoken command classification. INTERSPEECH Conference.
  32. Fairness reprogramming. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 34347–34362.
  33. Why adversarial reprogramming works, when it fails, and how to tell the difference. Information Sciences, 632: 130–143.
Citations (46)

Summary

  • The paper introduces model reprogramming, which repurposes pre-trained models through input transformation and output mapping layers.
  • It achieves resource efficiency by reducing trainable parameters, enabling robust performance in low-data and diverse application settings.
  • The analysis reveals that aligning latent representations is key to success, offering a theoretical foundation for adaptable machine learning.

Model Reprogramming: Resource-Efficient Cross-Domain Machine Learning

This document presents a cogent analysis of model reprogramming—a paradigm developed to enhance resource efficiency in cross-domain machine learning. Authored by Pin-Yu Chen from IBM Research, the paper explores the applications and theoretical underpinnings of model reprogramming for reusing pre-trained models across varied domains without engaging in model fine-tuning.

Overview

Model reprogramming offers a systematic approach to overcoming the limitations faced by deep learning when applied to resource-constrained domains. These limitations include inadequate data availability, restricted model development costs, and the absence of quality pre-trained models suitable for fine-tuning. By utilizing pre-trained models from source domains, model reprogramming efficiently extends their applicability to target domains which may be vastly different in nature.

Distinct from traditional paradigms such as transfer learning and training from scratch, model reprogramming mandates no change to the pre-trained model's parameters, only necessitating additions in the form of input transformation and output mapping layers. This method emerges as advantageous in small-scale data settings due to its reduction in the number of trainable parameters compared to the extensive parameter tuning often required for fine-tuning or training de novo.

Methodological Insights

The model reprogramming framework entails adding an input transformation layer to adapt the input of a target domain to fit the source model's dimensions, alongside an output mapping layer that aligns the source domain's output to the target task's requirements. For continuous data applications, this includes employing additive perturbations combined with binary masking, while discrete data applications might use trainable token embeddings or discrete token mappings.

These techniques have been substantiated across various studies, yielding impressive results. For instance, their application to biomedical domains by reprogramming image classification models has produced new state-of-the-art results. Moreover, reprogramming speech models to handle time-series data demonstrates the versatility and effectiveness of this approach in diverse contexts.

Theoretical Characterization

A significant contribution of the paper is its exploration of the theoretical foundations of model reprogramming. It presents an analytical basis, proving that the success of the reprogramming framework heavily relies on the alignment of latent representations between source and target domains—further substantiated by the reduced Wasserstein distance between these representations during reprogramming.

Moreover, other interpretations of model reprogramming underscore the optimization of input gradients and parameters, further enhancing adaptability and resultant performance on unseen tasks.

Implications and Future Directions

The research touches on pivotal potential developments for model reprogramming, stressing the importance of extending this framework beyond supervised learning to incorporate semi-supervised, unsupervised, and self-supervised methodologies. There's also an emerging interest in reprogramming large foundation models, which could further democratize machine learning by leveraging existing vast resources for competitive performance in low-resource settings.

Furthermore, the augmentation of trustworthiness in machine learning applications through improved robustness, fairness, and privacy represents another significant area for future exploration. Joint strategies combining model reprogramming with traditional fine-tuning methods also hold promise for optimizing resource efficiency.

Model reprogramming stands poised to influence machine learning infrastructures supporting heterogeneous computational environments, providing a tailored balance between computational overhead and model performance. As systems increasingly adopt federated or edge learning architectures, model reprogramming can play a crucial role in managing resource allocation while preserving privacy and minimizing latency.

Conclusion

Model reprogramming serves as an innovative and pragmatic approach in efficiently transferring knowledge across domain boundaries without direct access to vast computational resources. The robustness and adaptability offered by this methodology render it an invaluable tool in the machine learning arsenal, providing scalable solutions in contexts ranging from bioinformatics to natural language processing. As researchers continue to address the outlined future directions, model reprogramming could fundamentally shift the landscape of cross-domain machine learning.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com