Hedonic Games and Treewidth Revisited (2202.06925v1)

Abstract: We revisit the complexity of the well-studied notion of Additively Separable Hedonic Games (ASHGs). Such games model a basic clustering or coalition formation scenario in which selfish agents are represented by the vertices of an edge-weighted digraph $G=(V,E)$, and the weight of an arc $uv$ denotes the utility $u$ gains by being in the same coalition as $v$. We focus on (arguably) the most basic stability question about such a game: given a graph, does a Nash stable solution exist and can we find it efficiently? We study the (parameterized) complexity of ASHG stability when the underlying graph has treewidth $t$ and maximum degree $\Delta$. The current best FPT algorithm for this case was claimed by Peters [AAAI 2016], with time complexity roughly $2^{O(\Delta^5t)}$. We present an algorithm with parameter dependence $(\Delta t)^{O(\Delta t)}$, significantly improving upon the parameter dependence on $\Delta$ given by Peters, albeit with a slightly worse dependence on $t$. Our main result is that this slight performance deterioration with respect to $t$ is actually completely justified: we observe that the previously claimed algorithm is incorrect, and that in fact no algorithm can achieve dependence $t^{o(t)}$ for bounded-degree graphs, unless the ETH fails. This, together with corresponding bounds we provide on the dependence on $\Delta$ and the joint parameter establishes that our algorithm is essentially optimal for both parameters, under the ETH. We then revisit the parameterization by treewidth alone and resolve a question also posed by Peters by showing that Nash Stability remains strongly NP-hard on stars under additive preferences. Nevertheless, we also discover an island of mild tractability: we show that Connected Nash Stability is solvable in pseudo-polynomial time for constant $t$, though with an XP dependence on $t$ which, as we establish, cannot be avoided.