Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyond (2202.06861v3)

Published 14 Feb 2022 in cs.LG

Abstract: The evaluation of explanation methods is a research topic that has not yet been explored deeply, however, since explainability is supposed to strengthen trust in artificial intelligence, it is necessary to systematically review and compare explanation methods in order to confirm their correctness. Until now, no tool with focus on XAI evaluation exists that exhaustively and speedily allows researchers to evaluate the performance of explanations of neural network predictions. To increase transparency and reproducibility in the field, we therefore built Quantus -- a comprehensive, evaluation toolkit in Python that includes a growing, well-organised collection of evaluation metrics and tutorials for evaluating explainable methods. The toolkit has been thoroughly tested and is available under an open-source license on PyPi (or on https://github.com/understandable-machine-intelligence-lab/Quantus/).

Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyond

This paper introduces Quantus, a comprehensive toolkit designed to evaluate explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods. As the field of XAI grows, the need for standardized evaluation metrics has become increasingly important. Quantus addresses this gap by providing a robust Python-based tool that facilitates the systematic assessment and comparison of explanation methods.

Introduction and Motivation

The introduction of Quantus is motivated by the current limitations in the evaluation of XAI methods. Despite significant advances in XAI, the evaluation of explanations remains a complex issue, primarily due to the lack of a universally accepted definition of a "correct" explanation. This lack of standardization often results in varied and sometimes conflicting evaluation outcomes, posing challenges in comparability and reliability. The authors highlight the importance of achieving trust in AI systems through transparent and rigorous explanation evaluation.

Toolkit Overview

Quantus distinguishes itself from other XAI libraries by focusing specifically on evaluation with a collection of over 30 evaluation metrics. These metrics help quantify and compare explanations, addressing six categories: faithfulness, robustness, localization, complexity, randomization, and axiomatic properties. The toolkit aims to ensure a more objective and reproducible comparison of explanation methods, as illustrated in Table 1, where Quantus offers significantly broader coverage than existing libraries like Captum and TorchRay.

Architectural Insights

The design of Quantus emphasizes ease of use and customization. Its user-friendly API allows researchers to evaluate pre-computed explanations swiftly. The library supports multiple deep learning frameworks and offers flexibility, enabling researchers to tailor evaluation metrics according to the specific requirements of their tasks. This customization is critical, as the evaluation of explanations must consider the context, application, and AI model involved.

Evaluation and Implications

The introduction of Quantus is a critical step toward more reliable and standardized XAI evaluations. By addressing the intrinsic challenges of explainability, the toolkit offers a structured approach that mitigates common pitfalls and confounding factors. Notably, the paper emphasizes the importance of parameterization in evaluation metrics and includes mechanisms to guide users toward informed decision-making in using these metrics.

Broader Impact and Future Directions

Quantus plays a pivotal role in advancing XAI research by promoting reproducibility and transparency. By providing the community with an accessible and comprehensive set of tools, Quantus facilitates faster development and application of explanation methods. The toolkit's holistic evaluation approach is likely to be essential for the continued success and credibility of XAI methodologies.

Future developments include expanding Quantus to support a wider range of data types and extending its functionality for more sophisticated analysis, such as NLP. The ongoing evolution of this toolkit represents a significant contribution to the field, paving the way for more standardized and meaningful evaluations in explainable AI.

In conclusion, Quantus represents a necessary innovation in the landscape of XAI research. By providing a robust platform for the systematic evaluation of neural network explanations, it strengthens the foundation upon which trusted and reliable AI systems can be built.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (8)
  1. Anna Hedström (13 papers)
  2. Leander Weber (13 papers)
  3. Dilyara Bareeva (6 papers)
  4. Daniel Krakowczyk (2 papers)
  5. Franz Motzkus (6 papers)
  6. Wojciech Samek (144 papers)
  7. Sebastian Lapuschkin (66 papers)
  8. Marina M. -C. Höhne (22 papers)
Citations (150)