Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

DiffuseVAE: Efficient, Controllable and High-Fidelity Generation from Low-Dimensional Latents (2201.00308v3)

Published 2 Jan 2022 in cs.LG and cs.CV
DiffuseVAE: Efficient, Controllable and High-Fidelity Generation from Low-Dimensional Latents

Abstract: Diffusion probabilistic models have been shown to generate state-of-the-art results on several competitive image synthesis benchmarks but lack a low-dimensional, interpretable latent space, and are slow at generation. On the other hand, standard Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) typically have access to a low-dimensional latent space but exhibit poor sample quality. We present DiffuseVAE, a novel generative framework that integrates VAE within a diffusion model framework, and leverage this to design novel conditional parameterizations for diffusion models. We show that the resulting model equips diffusion models with a low-dimensional VAE inferred latent code which can be used for downstream tasks like controllable synthesis. The proposed method also improves upon the speed vs quality tradeoff exhibited in standard unconditional DDPM/DDIM models (for instance, FID of 16.47 vs 34.36 using a standard DDIM on the CelebA-HQ-128 benchmark using T=10 reverse process steps) without having explicitly trained for such an objective. Furthermore, the proposed model exhibits synthesis quality comparable to state-of-the-art models on standard image synthesis benchmarks like CIFAR-10 and CelebA-64 while outperforming most existing VAE-based methods. Lastly, we show that the proposed method exhibits inherent generalization to different types of noise in the conditioning signal. For reproducibility, our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/kpandey008/DiffuseVAE.

An Analysis of "DiffuseVAE: Efficient, Controllable and High-Fidelity Generation from Low-Dimensional Latents"

The paper presents "DiffuseVAE," a sophisticated framework that fuses Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) with Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs) to address limitations inherent in both model families. This approach effectively combines the strengths of VAEs, which offer a low-dimensional latent space, with the high fidelity sample generation capabilities of diffusion models. The integration is structured to leverage advantages such as reduced generation time and enhanced control over image synthesis while maintaining state-of-the-art quality.

Motivations and Contributions

VAEs are widely recognized for their utility in learning interpretable, low-dimensional representations; however, their output quality often lacks the fine detail associated with competing models like GANs. Conversely, diffusion models are celebrated for their impressive synthesis quality but suffer from slow iterative sampling and a lack of low-dimensional latent representation. The authors propose a two-stage mechanism in "DiffuseVAE" to mitigate these challenges:

  1. Framework Integration: The paper introduces a novel generator-refiner architecture wherein a VAE first generates a coarse image sample, which is subsequently refined by a conditional DDPM. This conditioning framework endows the diffusion process with a meaningful latent space, facilitating tasks such as controllable synthesis.
  2. Improved Speed vs. Quality Tradeoff: The paper showcases how DiffuseVAE surpasses traditional DDPM/DDIM models in terms of efficiency, achieving a notable reduction in Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) from 34.36 to 16.47 on the CelebA-HQ-128 benchmark using only 10 reverse-process steps.
  3. Controllable Synthesis: The framework allows for significant control over generated images via manipulation of the VAE latent space, demonstrated through techniques like attribute editing and interpolation.
  4. Generalization to Noisy Signals: An intriguing finding is the model's ability to generalize and enhance different noise types in the conditioning signal, highlighting its adaptability in unexpected situations.

Experimental Validation and Results

Extensive experiments validate the framework's capabilities:

  • The improvement in speed vs. quality is consistently exemplified across multiple image synthesis benchmarks, maintaining high-fidelity outputs in far fewer steps than required in traditional methods.
  • The incorporation of DDIM sampling illustrates the approach's compatibility with recent advancements in diffusion modeling, further optimizing generative efficiency.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The paper's hypothesis, associating the strong performance of DiffuseVAE with the synergy of VAEs and DDPMs, holds considerable implications:

  • Theoretically, it suggests a pathway to overcome traditional limitations of VAE quality through diffusion-based refinement.
  • Practically, the advancement in controllable synthesis opens new avenues for applications in areas demanding high degrees of customization, such as personalized media content generation.

Future Directions

Several open questions remain, providing fertile ground for future exploration:

  • The gap between DiffuseVAE and the best performing DDPMs at full sampling rates hints at potential enhancements, possibly through more sophisticated priors or other architectural innovations.
  • Further investigations into the adaptability of DiffuseVAE for other data modalities such as text or audio could broaden its utility.

In conclusion, this work presents a robust argument for the synergistic convergence of VAEs and DDPMs within a unified framework, achieving strong results in image generation tasks. The successful reduction of generation time while maintaining quality and control marks a significant step forward, setting a promising direction for future research in the field of generative modeling.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Kushagra Pandey (8 papers)
  2. Avideep Mukherjee (4 papers)
  3. Piyush Rai (55 papers)
  4. Abhishek Kumar (171 papers)
Citations (96)