Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning (2112.09118v4)

Published 16 Dec 2021 in cs.IR, cs.AI, and cs.CL

Abstract: Recently, information retrieval has seen the emergence of dense retrievers, using neural networks, as an alternative to classical sparse methods based on term-frequency. These models have obtained state-of-the-art results on datasets and tasks where large training sets are available. However, they do not transfer well to new applications with no training data, and are outperformed by unsupervised term-frequency methods such as BM25. In this work, we explore the limits of contrastive learning as a way to train unsupervised dense retrievers and show that it leads to strong performance in various retrieval settings. On the BEIR benchmark our unsupervised model outperforms BM25 on 11 out of 15 datasets for the Recall@100. When used as pre-training before fine-tuning, either on a few thousands in-domain examples or on the large MS~MARCO dataset, our contrastive model leads to improvements on the BEIR benchmark. Finally, we evaluate our approach for multi-lingual retrieval, where training data is even scarcer than for English, and show that our approach leads to strong unsupervised performance. Our model also exhibits strong cross-lingual transfer when fine-tuned on supervised English data only and evaluated on low resources language such as Swahili. We show that our unsupervised models can perform cross-lingual retrieval between different scripts, such as retrieving English documents from Arabic queries, which would not be possible with term matching methods.

Insights on "Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning"

The paper "Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning" addresses the limitations of current dense retrieval systems, especially their reliance on large labeled datasets, which hampers their applicability in domains with scarce training data. Traditional methods like BM25 often outperform dense retrievers in unsupervised settings. This work proposes a novel approach that leverages contrastive learning for training dense retrievers without supervision, demonstrating significant improvements over traditional term-frequency methods.

Key Contributions and Methodology

  1. Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Retrieval:
    • The paper presents a dense retrieval model trained using contrastive learning, which does not require annotated data.
    • The aim is to match or exceed BM25 performance across various benchmarks, especially in zero-shot settings.
  2. BEIR Benchmark and Retrieval Performance:
    • On the BEIR benchmark, the unsupervised dense retriever outperforms BM25 in 11 out of 15 datasets for Recall@100.
    • This highlights the model's capability to generalize across domains without relying on extensive in-domain training data.
  3. Pre-training and Fine-tuning Strategies:
    • The contrastive model is used for pre-training followed by fine-tuning on datasets with limited in-domain examples.
    • Results show that this approach surpasses the performance of models transferred from large datasets such as MS MARCO.
  4. Multilingual Capabilities:
    • The paper extends the approach to multilingual retrieval, where training data is often more limited.
    • The model demonstrates strong unsupervised performance and effective cross-lingual transfer, outperforming classical methods in scenarios requiring retrieval across different languages and scripts.
  5. Methodological Innovations:
    • Contrastive learning is enhanced with effective data augmentations and negative sampling strategies.
    • The paper explores various configurations, demonstrating that independent random cropping of text significantly improves retrieval performance compared to traditional tasks like the inverse Cloze task.

Experimental Results and Analyses

  • Comparison with Baselines:
    • The trained model shows superior performance to previous unsupervised methods, achieving competitive results even against systems enhanced with supervised data.
    • Ablation studies highlight the impactful design choices, such as using a large number of negatives in contrastive learning and adopting effective data augmentations, contributing to robust training.
  • Applications and Practical Implications:
    • This unsupervised approach reduces the dependency on extensive annotated datasets, making it suitable for emerging domains where such datasets are scarce.
    • The strong cross-lingual retrieval capabilities open practical avenues for deploying dense retrievers in multilingual scenarios, significantly broadening their application scope.

Theoretical Implications and Future Directions

  • The success of unsupervised contrastive learning techniques indicates a pivotal shift in how dense retrieval systems can be developed and deployed across varied linguistic and domain-specific environments.
  • Future research could explore further enhancements in contrastive learning paradigms and integrate more sophisticated data augmentation techniques to improve generalization capabilities.
  • There's potential for expanding these methods to more complex retrieval tasks, such as those involving more nuanced semantic understanding and contextual awareness.

Conclusion

This paper substantially contributes to the field by demonstrating the efficacy of contrastive learning for training unsupervised dense retrievers. It addresses key challenges in transferability and domain adaptation, paving the way for broader applications of dense retrieval systems in multi-domain and multilingual contexts. The research offers a promising direction for future development and optimization of retrieval models without the constraints of large-scale supervision.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Gautier Izacard (17 papers)
  2. Mathilde Caron (25 papers)
  3. Lucas Hosseini (9 papers)
  4. Sebastian Riedel (140 papers)
  5. Piotr Bojanowski (50 papers)
  6. Armand Joulin (81 papers)
  7. Edouard Grave (56 papers)
Citations (645)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com