Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
175 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Asymptotic Improvements on the Exact Matching Distance for 2-parameter Persistence (2111.10303v2)

Published 19 Nov 2021 in math.AT and cs.CG

Abstract: In the field of topological data analysis, persistence modules are used to express geometrical features of data sets. The matching distance $d_\mathcal{M}$ measures the difference between $2$-parameter persistence modules by taking the maximum bottleneck distance between $1$-parameter slices of the modules. The previous best algorithm to compute $d_\mathcal{M}$ exactly runs in $O(n{8+\omega})$ time using $O(n4)$ space, where $n$ is the number of generators and relations of the modules and $\omega$ is the matrix multiplication constant. We improve significantly on this by describing an algorithm with expected running time $O(n5 \log3 n)$ and using $O(n2)$ space. We first solve the decision problem $d_\mathcal{M}\leq \lambda$ for a constant $\lambda$ in $O(n5\log n)$ time by traversing a line arrangement in the dual plane, where each point represents a slice. Then we lift the line arrangement to a plane arrangement in $\mathbb{R}3$ whose vertices represent possible values for $d_\mathcal{M}$, and use a randomized incremental method to search through the vertices and find $d_\mathcal{M}$. The expected running time of this algorithm is $O((n4+T(n))\log2 n)$, where $T(n)$ is an upper bound for the complexity of deciding if $d_\mathcal{M}\leq \lambda$. Moreover, we show how to compute the matching distance using only linear space, to the price of a much worse time complexity.

Citations (12)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.