Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

NatiDroid: Cross-Language Android Permission Specification (2111.08217v1)

Published 16 Nov 2021 in cs.CR

Abstract: The Android system manages access to sensitive APIs by permission enforcement. An application (app) must declare proper permissions before invoking specific Android APIs. However, there is no official documentation providing the complete list of permission-protected APIs and the corresponding permissions to date. Researchers have spent significant efforts extracting such API protection mapping from the Android API framework, which leverages static code analysis to determine if specific permissions are required before accessing an API. Nevertheless, none of them has attempted to analyze the protection mapping in the native library (i.e., code written in C and C++), an essential component of the Android framework that handles communication with the lower-level hardware, such as cameras and sensors. While the protection mapping can be utilized to detect various security vulnerabilities in Android apps, such as permission over-privilege and component hijacking, imprecise mapping will lead to false results in detecting such security vulnerabilities. To fill this gap, we develop a prototype system, named NatiDroid, to facilitate the cross-language static analysis to benchmark against two state-of-the-art tools, termed Axplorer and Arcade. We evaluate NatiDroid on more than 11,000 Android apps, including system apps from custom Android ROMs and third-party apps from the Google Play. Our NatiDroid can identify up to 464 new API-permission mappings, in contrast to the worst-case results derived from both Axplorer and Arcade, where approximately 71% apps have at least one false positive in permission over-privilege and up to 3.6% apps have at least one false negative in component hijacking. Additionally, we identify that 24 components with at least one Native-triggered component hijacking vulnerability are misidentified by two benchmarks.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.