Query and Depth Upper Bounds for Quantum Unitaries via Grover Search (2111.07992v4)
Abstract: We prove that any $n$-qubit unitary transformation can be implemented (i) approximately in time $\tilde O\big(2{n/2}\big)$ with query access to an appropriate classical oracle, and also (ii) exactly by a circuit of depth $\tilde O\big(2{n/2}\big)$ with one- and two-qubit gates and $2{O(n)}$ ancillae. The proofs involve similar reductions to Grover search. The proof of (ii) also involves a linear-depth construction of arbitrary quantum states using one- and two-qubit gates (in fact, this can be improved to constant depth with the addition of fanout and generalized Toffoli gates) which may be of independent interest. We also prove a matching $\Omega\big(2{n/2}\big)$ lower bound for (i) and (ii) for a certain class of implementations.
- Scott Aaronson “Open problems related to quantum query complexity” Sec. 6, 2021 URL: https://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/open.pdf
- Scott Aaronson “The complexity of quantum states and transformations: from quantum money to black holes”, 2016 arXiv:1607.05256
- “Quantum versus classical proofs and advice” In Theory Comput. 3.7, 2007, pp. 129–157 DOI: 10.4086/toc.2007.v003a007
- Andris Ambainis “Quantum lower bounds by quantum arguments” In J. Comput. System Sci. 64.4, 2002, pp. 750–767 DOI: 10.1006/jcss.2002.1826
- “Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation” In Quantum computation and information 305, Contemp. Math. Amer. Math. Soc., 2002, pp. 53–74 DOI: 10.1090/conm/305/05215
- Christopher M. Dawson and Michael A. Nielsen “The Solovay–Kitaev algorithm” In Quantum Inf. Comput. 6.1, 2006, pp. 81–95 arXiv:quant-ph/0505030
- Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd and Lorenzo Maccone “Quantum random access memory” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 100.16, 2008, pp. 160501 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.160501
- Gene H Golub and Charles F Van Loan “Matrix computations” JHU press, 2013
- “Counting, fanout, and the complexity of quantum ACC” In Quantum Inf. Comput. 2.1, 2002, pp. 35–65 arXiv:quant-ph/0106017
- Johan Håstad “Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits” In STOC, 1986, pp. 6–20 DOI: 10.1145/12130.12132
- “Quantum fan-out is powerful” In Theory Comput. 1.5, 2005, pp. 81–103 DOI: 10.4086/toc.2005.v001a005
- “Quantum Computing and Communications: an engineering approach” John Wiley & Sons, 2005 DOI: 10.1002/9780470869048
- “Quantum search-to-decision reductions and the state synthesis problem” In CCC 234, 2022, pp. 5:1–5:19 DOI: 10.4230/lipics.ccc.2022.5
- Stasys Jukna “Boolean function complexity” Advances and frontiers 27, Algorithms and Combinatorics Springer, Heidelberg, 2012 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24508-4
- Oleg Lupanov “On a method of circuit synthesis” In Izvestia VUZ 1, 1958, pp. 120–140 DOI: 10.2307/2271493
- Ashwin Nayak “Inverting a permutation is as hard as unordered search” In Theory Comput. 7, 2011, pp. 19–25 DOI: 10.4086/toc.2011.v007a002
- Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition” Cambridge University Press, 2010 DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511976667
- Gregory Rosenthal “Efficient Quantum State Synthesis with One Query”, 2023 arXiv:2306.01723
- Claude Shannon “The synthesis of two-terminal switching circuits” In Bell System Tech. J. 28, 1949, pp. 59–98 DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1949.tb03624.x
- “Asymptotically optimal circuit depth for quantum state preparation and general unitary synthesis” In IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. IEEE, 2023 DOI: 10.1109/TCAD.2023.3244885
- “Collapse of the hierarchy of constant-depth exact quantum circuits” In Comput. Complexity 25.4, 2016, pp. 849–881 DOI: 10.1007/s00037-016-0140-0
- Nathan Wiebe Personal communication, 2021
- “Optimal (controlled) quantum state preparation and improved unitary synthesis by quantum circuits with any number of ancillary qubits” In Quantum 7, 2023, pp. 956 DOI: 10.22331/q-2023-03-20-956
- Xiao-Ming Zhang, Tongyang Li and Xiao Yuan “Quantum state preparation with optimal circuit depth: Implementations and applications” In Physical Review Letters 129.23, 2022, pp. 230504 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.230504