Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Re-calibrating Photometric Redshift Probability Distributions Using Feature-space Regression (2110.15209v2)

Published 28 Oct 2021 in astro-ph.IM, cs.LG, stat.ME, and stat.ML

Abstract: Many astrophysical analyses depend on estimates of redshifts (a proxy for distance) determined from photometric (i.e., imaging) data alone. Inaccurate estimates of photometric redshift uncertainties can result in large systematic errors. However, probability distribution outputs from many photometric redshift methods do not follow the frequentist definition of a Probability Density Function (PDF) for redshift -- i.e., the fraction of times the true redshift falls between two limits $z_{1}$ and $z_{2}$ should be equal to the integral of the PDF between these limits. Previous works have used the global distribution of Probability Integral Transform (PIT) values to re-calibrate PDFs, but offsetting inaccuracies in different regions of feature space can conspire to limit the efficacy of the method. We leverage a recently developed regression technique that characterizes the local PIT distribution at any location in feature space to perform a local re-calibration of photometric redshift PDFs. Though we focus on an example from astrophysics, our method can produce PDFs which are calibrated at all locations in feature space for any use case.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (8)
  1. Biprateep Dey (53 papers)
  2. Jeffrey A. Newman (184 papers)
  3. Brett H. Andrews (52 papers)
  4. Rafael Izbicki (57 papers)
  5. Ann B. Lee (34 papers)
  6. David Zhao (14 papers)
  7. Markus Michael Rau (30 papers)
  8. Alex I. Malz (27 papers)
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.