On the effects of biased quantum random numbers on the initialization of artificial neural networks (2108.13329v2)
Abstract: Recent advances in practical quantum computing have led to a variety of cloud-based quantum computing platforms that allow researchers to evaluate their algorithms on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. A common property of quantum computers is that they can exhibit instances of true randomness as opposed to pseudo-randomness obtained from classical systems. Investigating the effects of such true quantum randomness in the context of machine learning is appealing, and recent results vaguely suggest that benefits can indeed be achieved from the use of quantum random numbers. To shed some more light on this topic, we empirically study the effects of hardware-biased quantum random numbers on the initialization of artificial neural network weights in numerical experiments. We find no statistically significant difference in comparison with unbiased quantum random numbers as well as biased and unbiased random numbers from a classical pseudo-random number generator. The quantum random numbers for our experiments are obtained from real quantum hardware.
- ANU QRNG (2017) AARNnet cloudstor: pre-generated random binary numbers. https://cloudstor.aarnet.edu.au/plus/s/9Ik6roa7ACFyWL4/ANU_3May2012_100MB, accessed on April 2021
- ANU QRNG (2021) ANU QRNG quantum random numbers. https://qrng.anu.edu.au/, accessed on November 2021
- Benioff P (1980) The computer as a physical system: A microscopic quantum mechanical Hamiltonian model of computers as represented by Turing machines. Journal of Statistical Physics 22:563–591, DOI 10.1007/BF01011339
- Bird JJ, Ekárt A and Faria DR (2020) On the effects of pseudorandom and quantum-random number generators in soft computing. Soft Computing 24(12):9243–9256
- Frankle J and Carbin M (2019) The lottery ticket hypothesis: Finding sparse, trainable neural networks. 1803.03635
- Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6(2):65–70, URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
- IBM (2021) IBM Quantum. https://quantum-computing.ibm.com
- Khrennikov A (2015) Randomness: quantum versus classical. 1512.08852
- Nachman B and Geller MR (2021) Categorizing readout error correlations on near term quantum computers. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.04607, 2104.04607
- NIST (2010) Statistical Test Suite. https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/random-bit-generation/documentation-and-software, accessed on May 2021
- Norsen T (2017) Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Springer
- Picard D (2021) Torch.manual_seed(3407) is all you need: On the influence of random seeds in deep learning architectures for computer vision. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08203, 2109.08203
- Seabold S and Perktold J (2010) statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with Python. In: 9th Python in Science Conference
- Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27(3):379–423, DOI 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
- Wolter M (2021) Python implementation of the experiments from this manuscript. https://github.com/Castle-Machine-Learning/quantum-init-experiments
- Zeiler MD (2012) ADADELTA: An adaptive learning rate method. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5701, 1212.5701