Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Decentralizing Platform Power: A Design Space of Multi-level Governance in Online Social Platforms (2108.12529v4)

Published 27 Aug 2021 in cs.HC

Abstract: Many have criticized the centralized and unaccountable governance of prominent online social platforms, leading to renewed interest in platform governance that incorporates multiple centers of power. Decentralization of power can arise horizontally, through parallel communities, each with local administration, and vertically, through multiple hierarchies of overlapping jurisdiction. Drawing from literature on federalism and polycentricity in analogous offline institutions, we scrutinize the landscape of existing platforms through the lens of multi-level governance. Our analysis describes how online platforms incorporate varying forms and degrees of decentralized governance. In particular, we propose a framework that characterizes the general design space and the various ways that middle levels of governance vary in how they can interact with a centralized governance system above and end users below. This focus provides a starting point for new lines of inquiry between platform- and community-governance scholarship. By engaging themes of decentralization, hierarchy, power, and responsibility, while discussing concrete examples, we connect designers and theorists of online spaces.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (68)
  1. Aligica PD and Tarko V (2012) Polycentricity: from polanyi to ostrom, and beyond. Governance 25(2): 237–262.
  2. Ansell C and Torfing J (2016) Introduction: theories of governance. In: Handbook on theories of governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  3. Armitage D (2008) Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. International Journal of the commons 2(1): 7–32.
  4. Aroney N (2016) Types of federalism. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law, Forthcoming .
  5. Bache I and Flinders M (2004) Multi-level governance and the study of the british state. Public policy and administration 19(1): 31–51.
  6. Bednar J (2008) The robust federation: Principles of design. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Bednar J (2011) The political science of federalism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7: 269–288. 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105522.
  8. Berkes F (2010) Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future. Environmental Conservation : 489–500.
  9. Blomquist W and Schlager E (2005) Political pitfalls of integrated watershed management. Society and Natural Resources 18(2): 101–117.
  10. Caplan R and Gillespie T (2020) Tiered governance and demonetization: The shifting terms of labor and compensation in the platform economy. Social Media+ Society 6(2): 2056305120936636.
  11. Carlisle K and Gruby RL (2019) Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal 47(4): 927–952.
  12. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1(CSCW): 31:1–31:22. 10.1145/3134666. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3134666.
  13. Chatterjee M (2023) Social media’s fragmented future. URL https://www.politico.com/newsletters/digital-future-daily/2023/06/22/social-medias-fragmented-future-00103238.
  14. Chen Y, Pereira I and Patel PC (2020) Decentralized governance of digital platforms. Journal of Management : 0149206320916755.
  15. Datta S and Adar E (2019) Extracting inter-community conflicts in reddit. In: Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on Web and Social Media, volume 13. pp. 146–157.
  16. DeNardis L and Hackl AM (2015) Internet governance by social media platforms. Telecommunications Policy 39(9): 761–770.
  17. Elazar DJ (1994) Federal systems of the world: a handbook of federal, confederal and autonomy arrangements. Longman Current Affairs.
  18. Elazar DJ (2014) Exploring Federalism. University of Alabama Press.
  19. Emmet ER (1964) Learning to philosophize .
  20. Fan J and Zhang AX (2020) Digital juries: A civics-oriented approach to platform governance. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450367080, pp. 1–14. 10.1145/3313831.3376293. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376293.
  21. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30: 441–473.
  22. Frey S and Schneider N (2020) Effective voice: Beyond exit and affect in online communities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.12470 .
  23. Frey S and Sumner RW (2019) Emergence of integrated institutions in a large population of self-governing communities. PloS one 14(7): e0216335.
  24. Fukuyama F, Richman B and Goel A (2021) How to save democracy from technology: ending big tech’s information monopoly. Foreign Aff. 100: 98.
  25. Geiger RS (2016) Bot-based collective blocklists in twitter: the counterpublic moderation of harassment in a networked public space. Information, Communication & Society 19(6): 787–803. 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153700. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153700.
  26. Gelcich S (2014) Towards polycentric governance of small-scale fisheries: insights from the new ‘management plans’ policy in chile. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 24(5): 575–581.
  27. Yale University Press.
  28. Graeber J (2023) Composable moderation. URL https://blueskyweb.xyz/blog/4-13-2023-moderation.
  29. Grimmelmann J (2015) The virtues of moderation. Yale JL & Tech. 17: 42.
  30. Hooghe L and Marks G (2001) Types of multi-level governance. European integration online papers (EIoP) 5(11).
  31. Huang K (2022) What is mastodon and why are people leaving twitter for it? URL https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/07/technology/mastodon-twitter-elon-musk.html.
  32. Ingram D (2023) Reddit ceo slams protest leaders, saying he’ll change rules that favor ‘landed gentry’. URL https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/reddit-protest-blackout-ceo-steve-huffman-moderators-rcna89544.
  33. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 26(5). 10.1145/3338243. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3338243.
  34. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25(2). 10.1145/3185593. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3185593.
  35. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7(CSCW). 10.1145/3610080. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3610080.
  36. Kurrild-Klitgaard P (2010) Exit, collective action and polycentric political systems. Public choice 143(3-4): 339–352.
  37. Loughlin J, Kincaid J and Swenden W (2013) Routledge Handbook of Regionalism & Federalism. Routledge.
  38. Marshall GR (2015) Polycentricity and adaptive governance. Working Paper presented at the 15th Biannual International Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, Edmonton, Canada. .
  39. Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 543–559.
  40. Masnick M (2019) Protocols, not platforms: A technological approach to free speech. URL https://knightcolumbia.org/content/protocols-not-platforms-a-technological-approach-to-free-speech.
  41. Matias JN and Mou M (2018) Civilservant: Community-led experiments in platform governance. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, p. 9.
  42. Matias NJ (2016) The civic labor of online moderators. In: Internet Politics and Policy conference. Oxford, United Kingdom.
  43. McGillicuddy A, Bernard JG and Cranefield J (2016) Controlling Bad Behavior in Online Communities: An Examination of Moderation Work. ICIS 2016 Proceedings URL http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2016/SocialMedia/Presentations/23.
  44. McGinnis MD (2016) Polycentric governance in theory and practice: Dimensions of aspiration and practical limitations. Retrieved September 25: 2016.
  45. Public Administration Review 72(1): 15–25.
  46. Global Environmental Change 57: 101934.
  47. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  48. Ostrom E (1999) Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual review of political science 2(1): 493–535.
  49. Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American economic review 100(3): 641–72.
  50. Ostrom V (1973) Can federalism make a difference? Publius 3(2): 197–237.
  51. Ostrom V (1991) The meaning of American federalism: Constituting a self-governing society. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
  52. Ostrom V, Tiebout CM and Warren R (1961) The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. The American Political Science Review 55(4): 831–842.
  53. Peters J (2022) More than two million users have flocked to mastodon since elon musk took over twitter. URL https://www.theverge.com/2022/12/20/23518325/mastodon-monthly-active-users-twitter-elon-musk.
  54. Rajendra-Nicolucci C and Zuckerman E (2021) Forum logic: Topical, with a side of toxicity. URL https://knightcolumbia.org/blog/forum-logic-topical-with-a-side-of-toxicity.
  55. Rozenshtein AZ (2022) Moderating the fediverse: Content moderation on distributed social media .
  56. Scheuerman WE (2004) Democractic experimentalism or capitalist synchronization-critical reflections on directly-deliberative polyarchy. Can. JL & Jurisprudence 17: 101.
  57. New Media & Society : 1461444820986553.
  58. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. (CSCW).
  59. Seering J (2020) Reconsidering self-moderation: the role of research in supporting community-based models for online content moderation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4(CSCW2): 1–28.
  60. Shaw A and Hill BM (2014) Laboratories of oligarchy? how the iron law extends to peer production. Journal of Communication 64(2): 215–238.
  61. Simon HA (1991) The architecture of complexity. In: Facets of systems science. Springer, pp. 457–476.
  62. Tait A (2016) #youtubeisoverparty: Will youtube’s latest change destroy the platform?. newstatesman. URL https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/internet/2016/09/youtubeisoverparty-will-youtube-s-latest-change-destroy-platform.
  63. Thiel A, Garrick DE and Blomquist WA (2019) Governing complexity: Analyzing and applying polycentricity. Cambridge University Press.
  64. Tiihonen S (2004) From governing to governance. Tampere University Press.
  65. van Zeben JA (2013) Research agenda for a polycentric european union. Available at SSRN 2261006 .
  66. Watts RL (1999) Comparing federal systems. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University.
  67. Wright A and De Filippi P (2015) Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. Available at SSRN 2580664 .
  68. Zhu H, Kraut RE and Kittur A (2014) The impact of membership overlap on the survival of online communities. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. pp. 281–290.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Shagun Jhaver (19 papers)
  2. Seth Frey (28 papers)
  3. Amy Zhang (99 papers)
Citations (24)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now