Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Algorithmic Recourse in Partially and Fully Confounded Settings Through Bounding Counterfactual Effects (2106.11849v1)

Published 22 Jun 2021 in stat.ML, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: Algorithmic recourse aims to provide actionable recommendations to individuals to obtain a more favourable outcome from an automated decision-making system. As it involves reasoning about interventions performed in the physical world, recourse is fundamentally a causal problem. Existing methods compute the effect of recourse actions using a causal model learnt from data under the assumption of no hidden confounding and modelling assumptions such as additive noise. Building on the seminal work of Balke and Pearl (1994), we propose an alternative approach for discrete random variables which relaxes these assumptions and allows for unobserved confounding and arbitrary structural equations. The proposed approach only requires specification of the causal graph and confounding structure and bounds the expected counterfactual effect of recourse actions. If the lower bound is above a certain threshold, i.e., on the other side of the decision boundary, recourse is guaranteed in expectation.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Julius von Kügelgen (42 papers)
  2. Nikita Agarwal (17 papers)
  3. Jakob Zeitler (8 papers)
  4. Afsaneh Mastouri (3 papers)
  5. Bernhard Schölkopf (412 papers)
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.