Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
175 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Improved Distributed Lower Bounds for MIS and Bounded (Out-)Degree Dominating Sets in Trees (2106.02440v1)

Published 4 Jun 2021 in cs.DC

Abstract: Recently, Balliu, Brandt, and Olivetti [FOCS '20] showed the first $\omega(\log* n)$ lower bound for the maximal independent set (MIS) problem in trees. In this work we prove lower bounds for a much more relaxed family of distributed symmetry breaking problems. As a by-product, we obtain improved lower bounds for the distributed MIS problem in trees. For a parameter $k$ and an orientation of the edges of a graph $G$, we say that a subset $S$ of the nodes of $G$ is a $k$-outdegree dominating set if $S$ is a dominating set of $G$ and if in the induced subgraph $G[S]$, every node in $S$ has outdegree at most $k$. Note that for $k=0$, this definition coincides with the definition of an MIS. For a given $k$, we consider the problem of computing a $k$-outdegree dominating set. We show that, even in regular trees of degree at most $\Delta$, in the standard \LOCAL model, there exists a constant $\epsilon>0$ such that for $k\leq \Delta\epsilon$, for the problem of computing a $k$-outdegree dominating set, any randomized algorithm requires at least $\Omega(\min{\log\Delta,\sqrt{\log\log n}})$ rounds and any deterministic algorithm requires at least $\Omega(\min{\log\Delta,\sqrt{\log n}})$ rounds. The proof of our lower bounds is based on the recently highly successful round elimination technique. We provide a novel way to do simplifications for round elimination, which we expect to be of independent interest. Our new proof is considerably simpler than the lower bound proof in [FOCS '20]. In particular, our round elimination proof uses a family of problems that can be described by only a constant number of labels. The existence of such a proof for the MIS problem was believed impossible by the authors of [FOCS '20].

Citations (12)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.