Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Simulation of multi-species flow and heat transfer using physics-informed neural networks (2105.14907v1)

Published 31 May 2021 in physics.flu-dyn

Abstract: In the present work, single- and segregated-network PINN architectures are applied to predict momentum, species and temperature distributions of a dry air humidification problem in a simple 2D rectangular domain. The created PINN models account for variable fluid properties, species- and heat-diffusion and convection. Both the mentioned PINN architectures were trained using different hyperparameter settings, such as network width and depth to find the best-performing configuration. It is shown that the segregated-network PINN approach results in on-average 62% lower losses when compared to the single-network PINN architecture for the given problem. Furthermore, the single-network variant struggled to ensure species mass conservation in different areas of the computational domain, whereas, the segregated approach successfully maintained species conservation. The PINN predicted velocity, temperature and species profiles for a given set of boundary conditions were compared to results generated using OpenFOAM software. Both the single- and segregated-network PINN models produced accurate results for temperature and velocity profiles, with average percentage difference relative to the CFD results of approximately 7.5% for velocity and 8% for temperature. The mean error percentages for the species mass fractions are 9\% for the single-network model and 1.5% for the segregated-network approach. To showcase the applicability of PINNs for surrogate modelling of multi-species problems, a parameterised version of the segregated-network PINN is trained which could produce results for different water vapour inlet velocities. The normalised mean absolute percentage errors, relative to the OpenFOAM results, across three predicted cases for velocity and temperature are approximately 7.5% and 2.4% for water vapour mass fraction.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.