Boosting Monocular Depth Estimation Models to High-Resolution via Content-Adaptive Multi-Resolution Merging (2105.14021v1)

Abstract: Neural networks have shown great abilities in estimating depth from a single image. However, the inferred depth maps are well below one-megapixel resolution and often lack fine-grained details, which limits their practicality. Our method builds on our analysis on how the input resolution and the scene structure affects depth estimation performance. We demonstrate that there is a trade-off between a consistent scene structure and the high-frequency details, and merge low- and high-resolution estimations to take advantage of this duality using a simple depth merging network. We present a double estimation method that improves the whole-image depth estimation and a patch selection method that adds local details to the final result. We demonstrate that by merging estimations at different resolutions with changing context, we can generate multi-megapixel depth maps with a high level of detail using a pre-trained model.

• The paper outlines formal guidelines for CVPR rebuttal submissions, emphasizing a one-page, fact-based response that excludes new contributions.
• It details strict formatting conventions such as a two-column layout, 10-point Times Roman font, and precise section numbering to ensure consistency.
• The guidelines streamline the review process by focusing responses on factual inaccuracies and requested clarifications, rather than additional experiments or theories.

Insights into Author Rebuttal Submission Guidelines for CVPR

The paper "LaTeX Guidelines for Author Response" serves as an instructional document for authors who wish to submit a rebuttal to the reviews they receive during the CVPR conference submission process. The primary focus is on the formal guidelines that structure the rebuttal writing and submission format.

Structural Conventions and Limitations

A pivotal aspect of the rebuttal process, as outlined in the paper, is its limitation to a one-page PDF file. This restriction is not only pertinent to textual responses but also applies to any accompanying figures or references. The authors make it clear that a one-page rebuttal is designed solely to address factual inaccuracies or additional information requested by reviewers, excluding any new contributions such as theorems, algorithms, or experiments that were absent from the initial submission.

The 2018 PAMI-TC motion is crucial in this context, as it mandates that reviewers must not ask for additional experiments in the rebuttal nor should authors be penalized for not including such experiments. This motion underscores the rebuttal's intended purpose and ensures focus remains on the original content submitted.

Formatting Guidelines

The formatting guidelines are thorough and precise, underscoring the importance of consistent styling and layout across submissions. Key elements include:

• Two-column Layout: Authors must adhere to a two-column format with specified measurements for width and spacing.
• Font Requirements: All text must be in 10-point Times Roman, ensuring uniformity in appearance.
• Section Numbering: Numbering sections and equations is a critical methodological requirement for ease of reference.
• Graphic Placement: The paper emphasizes centering graphics and matching fonts to the body text to maintain clarity and consistency.

Implications and Future Outlook

The prescribed format and submission process have significant practical and theoretical implications. Practically, these guidelines streamline the review process, allowing reviewers to interpret rebuttals uniformly, minimizing format-related distractions. Theoretically, such structured guidelines enrich academic discourse by focusing critiques and responses on content rather than presentation, promoting constructive feedback that could guide future research endeavors.

Looking forward, as AI research and conferences continue to evolve, it is plausible that technological advancements may influence these rebuttal guidelines, potentially incorporating more interactive or dynamic multimedia elements in responses, contingent upon maintaining the core focus of clarity and brevity.

In summary, "LaTeX Guidelines for Author Response" provides a comprehensive framework for rebuttal submissions at CVPR, underscoring key structural conventions and limitations to maintain a focused academic dialogue. Its implications enhance the rigor and efficiency of the review process, paving the way for constructive academic exchange.