Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

There is no APTAS for 2-dimensional vector bin packing: Revisited (2104.13362v4)

Published 27 Apr 2021 in cs.DS and cs.CC

Abstract: We study the Vector Bin Packing and the Vector Bin Covering problems, multidimensional generalizations of the Bin Packing and the Bin Covering problems, respectively. In the Vector Bin Packing, we are given a set of $d$-dimensional vectors from $[0,1]d$ and the aim is to partition the set into the minimum number of bins such that for each bin $B$, each component of the sum of the vectors in $B$ is at most 1. Woeginger [Woe97] claimed that the problem has no APTAS for dimensions greater than or equal to 2. We note that there was a slight oversight in the original proof. In this work, we give a revised proof using some additional ideas from [BCKS06,CC09]. In fact, we show that it is NP-hard to get an asymptotic approximation ratio better than $\frac{600}{599}$. An instance of Vector Bin Packing is called $\delta$-skewed if every item has at most one dimension greater than $\delta$. As a natural extension of our general $d$-Dimensional Vector Bin Packing result we show that for $\varepsilon\in (0,\frac{1}{2500})$ it is NP-hard to obtain a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation for $\delta$-Skewed Vector Bin Packing if $\delta>20\sqrt \varepsilon$. In the Vector Bin Covering problem given a set of $d$-dimensional vectors from $[0,1]d$, the aim is to obtain a family of disjoint subsets (called bins) with the maximum cardinality such that for each bin $B$, each component of the sum of the vectors in $B$ is at least 1. Using ideas similar to our Vector Bin Packing result, we show that for Vector Bin Covering there is no APTAS for dimensions greater than or equal to 2. In fact, we show that it is NP-hard to get an asymptotic approximation ratio better than $\frac{998}{997}$.

Citations (10)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.