Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Effect of viscous shearing stresses on optimal material designs for flow of fluids through porous media (2104.07103v1)

Published 14 Apr 2021 in physics.flu-dyn, cs.NA, and math.NA

Abstract: Topology optimization offers optimal material layouts, enabling automation in the design of devices. Given the recent advances in computer technology and additive manufacturing, topology optimization is increasingly being used to design complex porous structures, for example, microfluidic devices. For the flow of fluids in such miniature-sized porous structures, viscous shearing stress will be significant. But the Darcy model -- the most popular mathematical model describing the flow of a single-phase incompressible fluid in rigid porous media -- neglects the internal friction arising from viscous shearing stress. We will therefore develop a material design framework under the topology optimization based on the Darcy-Brinkman model -- a mathematical model for the flow of fluids through porous media that accounts for internal friction besides the drag considered in the Darcy model. The proposed framework uses the total rate of mechanical dissipation -- a physical quantity -- for the objective function. To understand the effect of viscous shearing stress on the design, we will compare the optimal material layouts provided by the Darcy and Darcy-Brinkman models under topology optimization. In particular, we show, using analytical solutions corroborated by numerical simulations, that the optimal material layouts are identical for the class of problems exhibiting axisymmetry, for which viscous shearing stress vanishes. These analytical solutions will be valuable to check the veracity of numerical simulators. For those problems with dominant viscous shearing stresses (e.g., flow in a backward-facing step domain), we show, using numerical solutions, that the optimal material layouts under the Darcy and Darcy-Brinkman models are very different. Also, the associated solution fields (i.e., velocity and pressure) are qualitatively different under their respective optimal layouts for these two models.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.