Aligning Latent and Image Spaces to Connect the Unconnectable

Abstract: In this work, we develop a method to generate infinite high-resolution images with diverse and complex content. It is based on a perfectly equivariant generator with synchronous interpolations in the image and latent spaces. Latent codes, when sampled, are positioned on the coordinate grid, and each pixel is computed from an interpolation of the nearby style codes. We modify the AdaIN mechanism to work in such a setup and train the generator in an adversarial setting to produce images positioned between any two latent vectors. At test time, this allows for generating complex and diverse infinite images and connecting any two unrelated scenes into a single arbitrarily large panorama. Apart from that, we introduce LHQ: a new dataset of \lhqsize high-resolution nature landscapes. We test the approach on LHQ, LSUN Tower and LSUN Bridge and outperform the baselines by at least 4 times in terms of quality and diversity of the produced infinite images. The project page is located at https://universome.github.io/alis.

• The paper outlines comprehensive LaTeX formatting instructions for ICCV submissions to ensure consistent presentation and streamlined review.
• The paper enforces strict page limits and formatting rules, emphasizing an eight-page maximum (excluding references) to maintain focused discourse.
• The paper mandates anonymization guidelines to facilitate impartial blind reviews, balancing contextual citations with author anonymity.

An Examination of LaTeX Author Guidelines for ICCV Proceedings

This document serves as a comprehensive guide for authors intending to submit manuscripts to the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). It meticulously details the formatting and submission requirements, ensuring authors adhere to a standardized style that facilitates effective peer review and subsequent publication. The guidelines are crucial for maintaining consistency and quality across submissions, which supports an efficient review process and enhances the overall integrity of the conference's proceedings.

Paper Structure and Length

The paper specifies that submissions should be written in English and formatted strictly within an eight-page limit, excluding references. This constraint is in place to maintain a focused discourse and ensure fair comparison during the review process. Notably, the guide emphasizes that papers exceeding the limit, or those with altered formatting, will not be reviewed. This stipulation underscores the importance of adherence to guidelines in ensuring the reviewing process efficiently evaluates manuscripts' suitability within the page restrictions.

Anonymity in Blind Review

The section dedicated to blind review provides clarity on maintaining author anonymity, an essential aspect of ensuring impartiality in the review process. The guide specifies that while authors are not required to remove citations to their prior work, they must avoid self-identifying language. This distinction aims to balance the necessity for context against the need for anonymity, thereby facilitating a neutral evaluation of the work's merit.

Formatting Specifications

The document provides exhaustive details on text formatting, emphasizing the use of a two-column layout and specifying dimensions for text width, margins, and column spacing. Authors are directed to use Times or Times Roman fonts, with specific guidelines for title, author information, and various heading levels. Such precise formatting instructions are designed to ensure uniformity across all submissions, which aids in preserving a professional appearance in the final conference proceedings.

Additional Content Guidelines

The paper also includes practical advice on how best to integrate figures, tables, and equations within the text. For instance, it advises using \LaTeX's \verb+\includegraphics+ command for figures, emphasizing the need for clarity and printability. Moreover, the document briefly touches on footnotes and references, stressing clarity and consistency in bibliographic listings, adhering to the IEEE citation style.

Implications and Speculation

This collection of guidelines demonstrates the conference's commitment to upholding scientific rigor through clear communication and accessibility. By enforcing strict formatting, the ICCV ensures that each paper is easily navigable, allowing reviewers and readers to focus on the quality and content of the research without distraction from inconsistent or cluttered presentation styles.

Looking forward, as the digital landscape continues to evolve, it might be anticipated that these guidelines will incorporate more dynamic content elements, such as multimedia and interactive figures, raising further questions on how best to standardize these within traditional print-oriented formats.

In conclusion, the document represents a detailed framework to support authors in the preparation of their contributions to the ICCV, aiming to maintain the quality and uniformity that characterize high-caliber academic conferences. These procedures not only facilitate a fair and efficient review process but also enhance the dissemination and impact of research presented at ICCV.