Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Weed Detection from Images (2103.01415v1)

Published 2 Mar 2021 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: The rapid advances in Deep Learning (DL) techniques have enabled rapid detection, localisation, and recognition of objects from images or videos. DL techniques are now being used in many applications related to agriculture and farming. Automatic detection and classification of weeds can play an important role in weed management and so contribute to higher yields. Weed detection in crops from imagery is inherently a challenging problem because both weeds and crops have similar colours ('green-on-green'), and their shapes and texture can be very similar at the growth phase. Also, a crop in one setting can be considered a weed in another. In addition to their detection, the recognition of specific weed species is essential so that targeted controlling mechanisms (e.g. appropriate herbicides and correct doses) can be applied. In this paper, we review existing deep learning-based weed detection and classification techniques. We cover the detailed literature on four main procedures, i.e., data acquisition, dataset preparation, DL techniques employed for detection, location and classification of weeds in crops, and evaluation metrics approaches. We found that most studies applied supervised learning techniques, they achieved high classification accuracy by fine-tuning pre-trained models on any plant dataset, and past experiments have already achieved high accuracy when a large amount of labelled data is available.

Citations (276)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that CNNs and FCNs significantly enhance weed detection with high accuracy and robust feature extraction.
  • Data acquisition using sensors on UAVs and robots, coupled with image pre-processing and augmentation, is essential for model training.
  • The study outlines future directions including unsupervised learning and GAN-based approaches to address dataset limitations and real-time challenges.

Overview of Deep Learning Techniques for Weed Detection

The paper provides an extensive survey on the application of Deep Learning (DL) techniques in detecting and classifying weeds from image data, specifically within the domain of agriculture. The core motivation stems from the urgent need for efficient weed management due to the rising global population and demand for food production. The research highlights the intricate challenges faced in weed detection, such as color similarities between crops and weeds, shape and texture similarity, and varying conditions due to geographical and environmental factors.

Key Procedures

The paper methodically reviews several core procedures vital for DL-based weed detection:

  1. Data Acquisition: The paper indicates that data acquisition is primarily conducted using diverse sensors mounted on various platforms, including Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), field robots, and other ground vehicles. This diversity in data acquisition techniques supports the robustness of the models against different data modalities.
  2. Dataset Preparation: Data preparation involves multiple steps—including image pre-processing, data augmentation, and sometimes generation of synthetic images—to ensure that the data quality and distribution meet the requirements for effective model training. Different studies employ various pre-processing techniques such as background removal and image enhancement to refine the data before model consumption.
  3. DL Techniques for Detection, Localization, and Classification: The analysis reveals a strong preference for Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs) in performing segmentation and classification tasks. The paper evaluates conventional CNN architectures such as ResNet, VGGNet, AlexNet, and others, noting the superiority of these models over traditional machine learning approaches due to their robust feature extraction capabilities.
  4. Evaluation Metrics: The assessment metrics employed by studies vary, with accuracy, mean Intersection over Union (mIoU), and F1 score being the most prevalent for measuring classification efficacy and semantic segmentation performance.

Numerical Results and Claims

The paper reports that models trained with substantial amounts of labeled data achieve high accuracy. For instance, algorithms employing FCNs and CNNs often yield near-perfect classification results (e.g., ResNet achieving over 95% accuracy). These results corroborate the potential of DL models in automating the nuanced task of weed detection effectively.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of these advancements are manifold. Practically, they suggest potential integration into precision agriculture technologies such as autonomous weeding robots and targeted herbicide application systems. Theoretically, the survey underscore the need for more comprehensive datasets capturing the diverse conditions of crop fields, indicating a gap that future research should address.

Key future developments may include focusing on unsupervised and semi-supervised techniques to reduce the dependency on large annotated datasets. There is also anticipation that Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) might help in expanding datasets through synthetic data generation strategies. Addressing class imbalance and developing models capable of real-time inference on resource-constrained hardware remain critical areas for further exploration.

In conclusion, the survey offers a systematic examination of DL applications in automatic weed detection, highlighting present achievements and setting the stage for future studies in enhancing agricultural precision through AI. The comprehensive nature of this survey is pivotal in guiding subsequent research initiatives and technological implementations in the field.