Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Application-Driven Learning: A Closed-Loop Prediction and Optimization Approach Applied to Dynamic Reserves and Demand Forecasting (2102.13273v5)

Published 26 Feb 2021 in math.OC, cs.LG, cs.SY, eess.SY, stat.ME, and stat.ML

Abstract: Forecasting and decision-making are generally modeled as two sequential steps with no feedback, following an open-loop approach. In this paper, we present application-driven learning, a new closed-loop framework in which the processes of forecasting and decision-making are merged and co-optimized through a bilevel optimization problem. We present our methodology in a general format and prove that the solution converges to the best estimator in terms of the expected cost of the selected application. Then, we propose two solution methods: an exact method based on the KKT conditions of the second-level problem and a scalable heuristic approach suitable for decomposition methods. The proposed methodology is applied to the relevant problem of defining dynamic reserve requirements and conditional load forecasts, offering an alternative approach to current ad hoc procedures implemented in industry practices. We benchmark our methodology with the standard sequential least-squares forecast and dispatch planning process. We apply the proposed methodology to an illustrative system and to a wide range of instances, from dozens of buses to large-scale realistic systems with thousands of buses. Our results show that the proposed methodology is scalable and yields consistently better performance than the standard open-loop approach.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (8)
  1. Bengio Y (1997) Using a financial training criterion rather than a prediction criterion. International Journal of Neural Systems 8(04):433–443, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0129065797000422.
  2. Billingsley P (1986) Probability and Measure. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (Wiley), ISBN 9780471804789.
  3. Böhm V (1975) On the continuity of the optimal policy set for linear programs. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 28(2):303–306, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0128026.
  4. CAISO (2020) 2019 Annual Report on Market Issues and Performance. Department of Market Monitoring, California Independent System Operator. URL http://www.caiso.com/Documents/2019AnnualReportonMarketIssuesandPerformance.pdf.
  5. Elmachtoub AN, Grigas P (2022) Smart “predict, then optimize”. Management Science 68(1):9–26, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3922.
  6. Gurobi Optimization L (2020) Gurobi optimizer reference manual. URL http://www.gurobi.com.
  7. Tibshirani R (2011) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospective. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 73(3):273–282, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00771.x.
  8. Zellner A (1986a) Bayesian estimation and prediction using asymmetric loss functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(394):446–451, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478289.
Citations (6)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com