Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep learning-based COVID-19 pneumonia classification using chest CT images: model generalizability (2102.09616v1)

Published 18 Feb 2021 in physics.med-ph, cs.LG, and eess.IV

Abstract: Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, worldwide research efforts have focused on using AI technologies on various medical data of COVID-19-positive patients in order to identify or classify various aspects of the disease, with promising reported results. However, concerns have been raised over their generalizability, given the heterogeneous factors in training datasets. This study aims to examine the severity of this problem by evaluating deep learning (DL) classification models trained to identify COVID-19-positive patients on 3D computed tomography (CT) datasets from different countries. We collected one dataset at UT Southwestern (UTSW), and three external datasets from different countries: CC-CCII Dataset (China), COVID-CTset (Iran), and MosMedData (Russia). We divided the data into 2 classes: COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients. We trained nine identical DL-based classification models by using combinations of the datasets with a 72% train, 8% validation, and 20% test data split. The models trained on a single dataset achieved accuracy/area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) values of 0.87/0.826 (UTSW), 0.97/0.988 (CC-CCCI), and 0.86/0.873 (COVID-CTset) when evaluated on their own dataset. The models trained on multiple datasets and evaluated on a test set from one of the datasets used for training performed better. However, the performance dropped close to an AUC of 0.5 (random guess) for all models when evaluated on a different dataset outside of its training datasets. Including the MosMedData, which only contained positive labels, into the training did not necessarily help the performance on the other datasets. Multiple factors likely contribute to these results, such as patient demographics and differences in image acquisition or reconstruction, causing a data shift among different study cohorts.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (8)
  1. Dan Nguyen (55 papers)
  2. Fernando Kay (1 paper)
  3. Jun Tan (8 papers)
  4. Yulong Yan (4 papers)
  5. Yee Seng Ng (1 paper)
  6. Puneeth Iyengar (2 papers)
  7. Ron Peshock (1 paper)
  8. Steve Jiang (67 papers)
Citations (24)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.