Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: A survey (2101.06286v2)

Published 15 Jan 2021 in cs.IR

Abstract: Recommender systems (RSs) have become an inseparable part of our everyday lives. They help us find our favorite items to purchase, our friends on social networks, and our favorite movies to watch. Traditionally, the recommendation problem was considered to be a classification or prediction problem, but it is now widely agreed that formulating it as a sequential decision problem can better reflect the user-system interaction. Therefore, it can be formulated as a Markov decision process (MDP) and be solved by reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. Unlike traditional recommendation methods, including collaborative filtering and content-based filtering, RL is able to handle the sequential, dynamic user-system interaction and to take into account the long-term user engagement. Although the idea of using RL for recommendation is not new and has been around for about two decades, it was not very practical, mainly because of scalability problems of traditional RL algorithms. However, a new trend has emerged in the field since the introduction of deep reinforcement learning (DRL), which made it possible to apply RL to the recommendation problem with large state and action spaces. In this paper, a survey on reinforcement learning based recommender systems (RLRSs) is presented. Our aim is to present an outlook on the field and to provide the reader with a fairly complete knowledge of key concepts of the field. We first recognize and illustrate that RLRSs can be generally classified into RL- and DRL-based methods. Then, we propose an RLRS framework with four components, i.e., state representation, policy optimization, reward formulation, and environment building, and survey RLRS algorithms accordingly. We highlight emerging topics and depict important trends using various graphs and tables. Finally, we discuss important aspects and challenges that can be addressed in the future.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. M. Mehdi Afsar (4 papers)
  2. Trafford Crump (3 papers)
  3. Behrouz Far (4 papers)
Citations (352)

Summary

Overview of Reinforcement Learning based Recommender Systems: A Survey

The paper, "Reinforcement Learning based Recommender Systems: A Survey," by Afsar et al., provides a comprehensive exploration of the intersection between reinforcement learning (RL) and recommender systems (RS). This survey is particularly timely given the increasing integration of RL methods in developing powerful RSs to manage the burgeoning data challenges within various online platforms. By framing the recommendation problem as a sequential decision-making task, RL offers a promising avenue for handling dynamic user interactions and optimizing long-term user engagement.

Reinforcement Learning in RSs

Traditional recommender systems often use collaborative filtering or content-based filtering techniques, which can suffer from scalability issues, lack of novelty, and cold start problems. RL offers a sophisticated alternative by formulating recommendation as a Markov Decision Process (MDP), thereby transforming it into a sequential decision-making problem. This contrasts with conventional, static approaches by enabling systems to adapt to user preferences dynamically. Moreover, the advent of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has mitigated earlier issues of scalability associated with applying RL to large state and action spaces, enabling more complex models that capture nuances in user behavior.

Framework for RLRS

The survey introduces a framework for RL-based RSs, categorizing them into RL-based and DRL-based approaches and detailing them through four core components: state representation, policy optimization, reward formulation, and environment building. This structured approach provides clarity on how RL concepts are operationalized within RSs:

  1. State Representation: Capturing user history, preferences, and context, which are critical for decision-making in RLRS.
  2. Policy Optimization: Exploring a variety of RL algorithms for guiding recommendation policy, from tabular Q-learning to sophisticated DRL methods like DDPG and PPO.
  3. Reward Formulation: Revealing the strategies used to design reward functions to guide optimal action selections and enhance long-term user satisfaction.
  4. Environment Building: Utilizing offline datasets, simulations, and online evaluations to test and refine algorithms.

Key Trends and Future Directions

The survey illustrates the proliferation of DRL in RSs, spotlighting its role in tackling large action spaces via novel architectures like Wolpertinger, and in developing robust policies using DQN variants. DRL enables RLRSs to better mimic and predict user behavior, enhancing recommendation accuracy and user satisfaction.

Emerging topics such as multi-agent RL, hierarchical RL, and knowledge graph integrations signify innovative pathways to deepen the impact of RL in RSs. These methods promise better scalability, more nuanced decision-making, and improved explainability. Moreover, by embracing adversarial training and incorporating safe RL practices, researchers are addressing critical concerns regarding fairness and reliability in automated recommendations.

Implications and Challenges

This survey underscores the transformative impact of RL on the future of RSs, where theoretical advancements may amplify practical implementations, and vice versa. By optimizing the interaction between users and systems, RLRS holds the potential for creating highly personalized, efficient, and engaging user experiences.

Challenges persist, notably in designing explainable systems that can elucidate their decision-making processes, ensuring reproducibility to verify claims and results, and developing robust evaluation environments that simulate real-world conditions without incurring excessive costs. Addressing these challenges requires continued interdisciplinary collaboration bridging RL, human-computer interaction, and data science.

Conclusion

Overall, this survey on RL-based recommender systems is an insightful resource for experienced researchers investigating the potential synergies between RL and RS. While it emphasizes the emerging trends and notable achievements in the field, it also encourages further exploration of novel methodologies, underscoring the ongoing evolution in leveraging RL to reimagine and redesign recommender systems. The paper serves as a foundational reference for future research aiming to harness the full potential of RL in creating next-generation recommender systems.