Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Structured Prediction as Translation between Augmented Natural Languages (2101.05779v3)

Published 14 Jan 2021 in cs.LG and cs.CL

Abstract: We propose a new framework, Translation between Augmented Natural Languages (TANL), to solve many structured prediction language tasks including joint entity and relation extraction, nested named entity recognition, relation classification, semantic role labeling, event extraction, coreference resolution, and dialogue state tracking. Instead of tackling the problem by training task-specific discriminative classifiers, we frame it as a translation task between augmented natural languages, from which the task-relevant information can be easily extracted. Our approach can match or outperform task-specific models on all tasks, and in particular, achieves new state-of-the-art results on joint entity and relation extraction (CoNLL04, ADE, NYT, and ACE2005 datasets), relation classification (FewRel and TACRED), and semantic role labeling (CoNLL-2005 and CoNLL-2012). We accomplish this while using the same architecture and hyperparameters for all tasks and even when training a single model to solve all tasks at the same time (multi-task learning). Finally, we show that our framework can also significantly improve the performance in a low-resource regime, thanks to better use of label semantics.

Insights into "Structured Prediction as Translation between Augmented Natural Languages"

The paper introduces a novel framework, Translation between Augmented Natural Languages (TANL), designed to address structured prediction tasks in NLP by casting them as translation problems. This approach encompasses a diverse array of tasks including joint entity and relation extraction, semantic role labeling, and others. Unlike traditional methods relying on task-specific classifiers dependent on discriminative models, TANL employs a text-to-text generative paradigm that leverages pre-trained transformer models like T5.

Key Contributions and Numerical Results

The authors highlight several contributions of TANL. Firstly, TANL applies a unified architecture for different tasks by designing augmented natural languages that encode structured information within the input or output text. This eliminates the need for task-specific modules and allows TANL to achieve results that are comparable to or better than existing task-specific models across various datasets. Notably, it achieves state-of-the-art performance in several benchmarks, including joint entity and relation extraction on datasets like CoNLL04 and NYT, and relation classification on TACRED.

The paper presents robust empirical results demonstrating TANL's data efficiency. For instance, in low-resource settings, TANL outperforms existing state-of-the-art systems, suggesting its stronger capability in generalizing from limited data. Additionally, through ablation studies, the authors demonstrate that retaining label semantics, maintaining an augmented natural language format, and employing dynamic programming for alignment are crucial for achieving high performance.

Implications for NLP Research and Practice

The research indicates that a generative approach to structured prediction, hitherto underexplored, can be applied effectively across a wide set of NLP tasks with a unified model. This has significant implications for the development of NLP systems, particularly in reducing the complexity and resource requirements associated with developing task-specific models. The flexibility and robustness of TANL also suggest it is a promising candidate for settings where labeled data is sparse or costly to obtain.

From a theoretical perspective, TANL alters the landscape of structured prediction by shifting the focus towards leveraging LLM pretraining and output semantics. It questions the reliance on specialized discriminative components and suggests a potential for cross-task knowledge transfer that could simplify model design in multi-task environments.

Future Directions

TANL opens several avenues for future research. First, exploring its extension to other generative architectures such as BART or GPT-2 could further increase its efficacy or adaptability. Additionally, given its promising performance in low-resource settings, further enhancements and testing under various few-shot and zero-shot scenarios could be valuable.

In conclusion, TANL represents a robust approach to structured prediction, leveraging the strengths of augmented natural languages and generative models. It underscores the potential for unified systems in NLP, pushing the boundaries from specialized task models towards more adaptable, efficient, and semantically enriched methodologies.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Giovanni Paolini (28 papers)
  2. Ben Athiwaratkun (28 papers)
  3. Jason Krone (9 papers)
  4. Jie Ma (205 papers)
  5. Alessandro Achille (60 papers)
  6. Rishita Anubhai (9 papers)
  7. Cicero Nogueira dos Santos (31 papers)
  8. Bing Xiang (74 papers)
  9. Stefano Soatto (179 papers)
Citations (271)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com