Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Can Transformers Reason About Effects of Actions? (2012.09938v1)

Published 17 Dec 2020 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: A recent work has shown that transformers are able to "reason" with facts and rules in a limited setting where the rules are natural language expressions of conjunctions of conditions implying a conclusion. Since this suggests that transformers may be used for reasoning with knowledge given in natural language, we do a rigorous evaluation of this with respect to a common form of knowledge and its corresponding reasoning -- the reasoning about effects of actions. Reasoning about action and change has been a top focus in the knowledge representation subfield of AI from the early days of AI and more recently it has been a highlight aspect in common sense question answering. We consider four action domains (Blocks World, Logistics, Dock-Worker-Robots and a Generic Domain) in natural language and create QA datasets that involve reasoning about the effects of actions in these domains. We investigate the ability of transformers to (a) learn to reason in these domains and (b) transfer that learning from the generic domains to the other domains.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Pratyay Banerjee (31 papers)
  2. Chitta Baral (152 papers)
  3. Man Luo (55 papers)
  4. Arindam Mitra (40 papers)
  5. Kuntal Pal (30 papers)
  6. Tran C. Son (1 paper)
  7. Neeraj Varshney (47 papers)
Citations (9)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.