Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Learning from Human Directional Corrections (2011.15014v3)

Published 30 Nov 2020 in cs.RO, cs.LG, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel approach that enables a robot to learn an objective function incrementally from human directional corrections. Existing methods learn from human magnitude corrections; since a human needs to carefully choose the magnitude of each correction, those methods can easily lead to over-corrections and learning inefficiency. The proposed method only requires human directional corrections -- corrections that only indicate the direction of an input change without indicating its magnitude. We only assume that each correction, regardless of its magnitude, points in a direction that improves the robot's current motion relative to an unknown objective function. The allowable corrections satisfying this assumption account for half of the input space, as opposed to the magnitude corrections which have to lie in a shrinking level set. For each directional correction, the proposed method updates the estimate of the objective function based on a cutting plane method, which has a geometric interpretation. We have established theoretical results to show the convergence of the learning process. The proposed method has been tested in numerical examples, a user study on two human-robot games, and a real-world quadrotor experiment. The results confirm the convergence of the proposed method and further show that the method is significantly more effective (higher success rate), efficient/effortless (less human corrections needed), and potentially more accessible (fewer early wasted trials) than the state-of-the-art robot learning frameworks.

An Expert Overview of "Learning from Human Directional Corrections"

The research paper, "Learning from Human Directional Corrections," introduces a novel approach for robot learning that aims to address specific challenges associated with human-robot interactions in dynamic environments. The core innovation of this methodology lies in its departure from traditional practices that primarily rely on human magnitude corrections. Instead, the authors propose utilizing directional corrections, which offer a more efficient and robust framework for incremental robot learning.

Key Contributions

The paper presents a method where human operators can provide directional corrections to robots, indicating the intended direction of improvement without specifying the magnitude of the correction. This feature addresses the difficulty and inefficiency often observed when humans attempt to provide precise magnitude corrections. Traditional approaches necessitate careful selection of the magnitude to avoid over-corrections, an issue substantially mitigated by focusing on directional inputs.

The authors illustrate the method's effectiveness via theoretical guarantees such as convergence proofs. The proposed approach leverages cutting-plane methods—linear hyperplanes in parameter space that iteratively refine the robot's understanding of an implicit cost function it seeks to minimize through human-provided corrections.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

Practically, this approach enhances the accessibility of robot training processes for non-expert users, who may lack the ability to provide optimal, magnitude-specific inputs. By allowing broader correction vectors, the proposed method is more likely to capture valid human inputs, thus reducing the learning time and effort.

Theoretically, the paper contributes significant insight into inverse reinforcement learning by removing the necessity of trajectory pre-processing—a common step in related methods that could introduce biases. This direct handling of human corrections without preprocessing steps presents an opportunity for more accurate learning and less sensitivity to noise and artifacts in the training data.

Experiments in user studies and real-world settings, including a simulated robot arm task and a quadrotor navigation challenge, validate the method's efficacy and efficiency. These tests demonstrate the method's robustness across various conditions—yielding faster learning rates and lesser input requirements compared to prior state-of-the-art techniques.

Experimental Validation and Results

The proposed framework was implemented in both simulated environments and real-world studies, leading to empirical evidence of its performance. Noteworthy outcomes include a reduction in the number of human corrections required, higher success rates in achieving task goals, and significant improvement in accessibility for human users without prior robotic expertise.

Furthermore, the experimental results substantiate the theoretical claims regarding convergence. The convergence rate observed in practice aligns with analytical predictions, underscoring the practical alignment with theoretical expectations.

Speculation and Future Directions

The promise shown by learning from directional corrections invites several avenues for future exploration. Integration with advanced robotic systems, extension to multi-agent collaborative settings, and the incorporation of machine learning models that encompass more complex state-action pairings represent potential areas for further research. Additionally, addressing more intricate real-world dynamics and incorporating multimodal sensing feedback could enhance applicability and robustness in diverse operational environments.

This paper signifies a pivotal step toward scalable and user-friendly robot learning systems, advancing the adaptability and autonomy of robotic platforms. From a broader AI perspective, it heralds an important paradigm shift in how robots can cohesively interact and adapt alongside humans in shared workplaces.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Wanxin Jin (25 papers)
  2. Todd D. Murphey (38 papers)
  3. Zehui Lu (14 papers)
  4. Shaoshuai Mou (44 papers)
Citations (11)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com