Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Benchmarking Image Retrieval for Visual Localization (2011.11946v2)

Published 24 Nov 2020 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Visual localization, i.e., camera pose estimation in a known scene, is a core component of technologies such as autonomous driving and augmented reality. State-of-the-art localization approaches often rely on image retrieval techniques for one of two tasks: (1) provide an approximate pose estimate or (2) determine which parts of the scene are potentially visible in a given query image. It is common practice to use state-of-the-art image retrieval algorithms for these tasks. These algorithms are often trained for the goal of retrieving the same landmark under a large range of viewpoint changes. However, robustness to viewpoint changes is not necessarily desirable in the context of visual localization. This paper focuses on understanding the role of image retrieval for multiple visual localization tasks. We introduce a benchmark setup and compare state-of-the-art retrieval representations on multiple datasets. We show that retrieval performance on classical landmark retrieval/recognition tasks correlates only for some but not all tasks to localization performance. This indicates a need for retrieval approaches specifically designed for localization tasks. Our benchmark and evaluation protocols are available at https://github.com/naver/kapture-localization.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. NoƩ Pion (5 papers)
  2. Martin Humenberger (10 papers)
  3. Gabriela Csurka (31 papers)
  4. Yohann Cabon (18 papers)
  5. Torsten Sattler (72 papers)
Citations (63)

Summary

Benchmarking Image Retrieval for Visual Localization: A Comprehensive Assessment

The paper "Benchmarking Image Retrieval for Visual Localization" presents a systematic evaluation of image retrieval techniques and their application to visual localization tasks, which are vital in fields like autonomous driving and augmented reality. Visual localization involves estimating the precise camera pose within a known environment. The authors critically investigate the role of state-of-the-art image retrieval methods, traditionally utilized for landmark recognition, by introducing a benchmark setup that assesses their efficacy in visual localization across various datasets.

Core Contributions and Observations

The research investigates image retrieval for three primary localization tasks:

  1. Pose Approximation - Utilizing image retrieval to find database images taken from poses similar to that of the query image.
  2. Pose Estimation Without a Global Map (Local SFM) - Constructing a 3D model from retrieved images and estimating the query's pose.
  3. Pose Estimation with a Global Map - Employing a pre-built 3D scene representation for pose determination.

The paper finds that for Task 1, the retrieval performance based on landmark recognition tasks does not necessarily correlate to retrieval performance in localization contexts, particularly for pose approximation tasks. DenseVLAD, a feature representation included in the paper, displayed robustness to illumination changes but lacked the viewpoint generalization offered by more sophisticated descriptors like DELG and AP-GeM.

For Tasks 2a and 2b, results indicate that an accurate visual localization requires image retrieval methods sensitive to changes in viewing conditions but does not demand the invariance needed by landmark recognition tasks. Especially for Task 2b, the paper reveals a necessity for at least one relevant retrieval to ensure the success of pose estimation, pointing out that the correlation between retrieval metrics such as Recall@kk and pose accuracy can be substantial.

Implications and Speculations

The insights provided by this benchmark are twofold. First, they demonstrate that image representations optimized for place recognition may not directly translate to improved performance in visual localization tasks requiring viewpoint discernment. Second, the findings emphasize the critical need for designing task-specific retrieval strategies that consider localization needs, especially since current state-of-the-art descriptors, though robust, were not originally tailored for the nuanced demands of visual localization tasks.

Practically, the outcomes of this research have profound implications for developing localization systems where computational efficiency and accuracy are paramount. For instance, systems in autonomous vehicle navigation can leverage the observed correlations between retrieval strategies and localization accuracy to optimize the balance between accurate pose estimation and processing time.

Future Directions

Future research could involve experimenting with novel descriptors or machine learning models explicitly trained on visual localization-specific tasks, contrasting them against the current state-of-the-art retrieval methods. Additionally, exploring multimodal retrieval techniques, integrating data other than visual cues (e.g., GPS or IMU data), could also yield promising improvements in scenarios with significant viewpoint changes or occlusions.

The provided benchmark framework, made publicly available by the authors, paves the way for ongoing research and development, encouraging broader community contributions to refining visual localization methodologies. This research underscores the value of benchmarks in challenging assumptions and guiding innovative approaches to complex problems in computer vision and robotics.

Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com