Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Making mean-estimation more efficient using an MCMC trace variance approach: DynaMITE (2011.11129v5)

Published 22 Nov 2020 in cs.DS

Abstract: We introduce a novel statistical measure for MCMC-mean estimation, the inter-trace variance ${\rm trv}{(\tau_{rel})}({\cal M},f)$, which depends on a Markov chain ${\cal M}$ and a function $f:S\to [a,b]$. The inter-trace variance can be efficiently estimated from observed data and leads to a more efficient MCMC-mean estimator. Prior MCMC mean-estimators receive, as input, upper-bounds on $\tau_{mix}$ or $\tau_{rel}$, and often also the stationary variance, and their performance is highly dependent to the sharpness of these bounds. In contrast, we introduce DynaMITE, which dynamically adjusts the sample size, it is less sensitive to the looseness of input upper-bounds on $\tau_{rel}$, and requires no bound on $v_{\pi}$. Receiving only an upper-bound ${\cal T}{rel}$ on $\tau{rel}$, DynaMITE estimates the mean of $f$ in $\tilde{\cal{O}}\bigl(\smash{\frac{{\cal T}{rel} R}{\varepsilon}}+\frac{\tau{rel}\cdot {\rm trv}{(\tau{{rel}})}}{\varepsilon{2}}\bigr)$ steps, without a priori bounds on the stationary variance $v_{\pi}$ or the inter-trace variance ${\rm trv}{(\tau rel)}$. Thus we depend minimally on the tightness of ${\cal T}{mix}$, as the complexity is dominated by $\tau{rel}\rm{trv}{(\tau{rel})}$ as $\varepsilon \to 0$. Note that bounding $\tau_{\rm rel}$ is known to be prohibitively difficult, however, DynaMITE is able to reduce its principal dependence on ${\cal T}{rel}$ to $\tau{rel}$, simply by exploiting properties of the inter-trace variance. To compare our method to known variance-aware bounds, we show ${\rm trv}{(\tau{rel})}({\cal M},f) \leq v_{\pi}$. Furthermore, we show when $f$'s image is distributed (semi)symmetrically on ${\cal M}$'s traces, we have ${\rm trv}{({\tau{rel}})}({\cal M},f)=o(v_{\pi}(f))$, thus DynaMITE outperforms prior methods in these cases.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Cyrus Cousins (17 papers)
  2. Shahrzad Haddadan (11 papers)
  3. Eli Upfal (44 papers)
Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com