Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

NLPGym -- A toolkit for evaluating RL agents on Natural Language Processing Tasks (2011.08272v1)

Published 16 Nov 2020 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently shown impressive performance in complex game AI and robotics tasks. To a large extent, this is thanks to the availability of simulated environments such as OpenAI Gym, Atari Learning Environment, or Malmo which allow agents to learn complex tasks through interaction with virtual environments. While RL is also increasingly applied to NLP, there are no simulated textual environments available for researchers to apply and consistently benchmark RL on NLP tasks. With the work reported here, we therefore release NLPGym, an open-source Python toolkit that provides interactive textual environments for standard NLP tasks such as sequence tagging, multi-label classification, and question answering. We also present experimental results for 6 tasks using different RL algorithms which serve as baselines for further research. The toolkit is published at https://github.com/rajcscw/nlp-gym

Overview of NLPGym: A Toolkit for Evaluating RL Agents on NLP Tasks

The paper introduces NLPGym, an open-source Python toolkit specifically designed to address the growing intersection between reinforcement learning (RL) and NLP tasks. As RL gains traction in NLP, there is a marked lack of existing frameworks to effectively simulate textual environments for the evaluation and benchmarking of RL agents. NLPGym fills this void, offering a standard platform with interactive environments for several NLP tasks. This paper offers a detailed description of NLPGym's architecture, its integration capabilities, and its performance benchmarks across various NLP tasks such as sequence tagging, multi-label classification, and question answering.

Key Contributions

  1. Framework Introduction: NLPGym builds a bridge between RL and NLP by providing textual environments that can simulate the interactions needed for natural language understanding tasks. These environments operate under the RL paradigm, formatted as Markov Decision Processes (MDP) which is conducive for RL agent training.
  2. Tasks and Environments: The toolkit includes environments for three primary tasks:
    • Sequence Tagging: Tasks like named entity recognition are implemented where agents sequentially tag sentences.
    • Multi-label Classification: Agents generate multi-label outputs for input sentences, applicable in scenarios like document categorization.
    • Question Answering: Agents answer multiple-choice questions based on provided text, which is pivotal in tasks involving reading comprehension.
  3. Modular Design: One of the strengths of NLPGym is its modular design, allowing researchers to tailor tasks with custom datasets, observation featurizers, and reward functions. This flexibility ensures the toolkit is adaptable to a wide range of NLP tasks without requiring significant modifications.
  4. Integration and Compatibility: NLPGym leverages standard RL interfaces, ensuring compatibility with existing RL libraries such as baselines, stable-baselines, and RLLib. This integration streamlines the process for researchers familiar with these frameworks and aids in the seamless deployment of RL agents for experimentation.
  5. Benchmarking and Baselines: The paper presents baseline results using RL algorithms like PPO and DQN across the outlined NLP tasks. These results serve as foundational benchmarks that future research can refer to or improve upon.

Experimental Insights

The experiments indicated varied performance across the tasks, with RL agents demonstrating effective learning capabilities, particularly in sequence tagging and multi-label classification. While these tasks showed promising results, the question-answering tasks highlighted areas for improvement, notably in the generalization capabilities of the trained agents. This suggests that more complex featurization or architectural enhancements, such as those involving advanced models like BERT, might be required to achieve better results in reading comprehension tasks.

Implications and Future Work

The introduction of NLPGym can significantly accelerate research at the intersection of NLP and RL by providing a robust testing ground for novel algorithms. Specifically, it standardizes how tasks are defined and benchmarked, which could foster more collaborative efforts and reproducibility within the community. Its modular design also invites innovative contributions that could expand the toolkit’s applications beyond the initial tasks.

In terms of future developments, the authors suggest extending the toolkit to cover additional tasks like text summarization, language generation, and machine translation—all of which can be naturally framed within the RL paradigm. Additionally, integrating more sophisticated models and incorporating human-in-the-loop approaches for scenarios requiring active learning or user feedback are promising directions.

Overall, NLPGym marks a significant step towards structured development and evaluation environments for RL applications in NLP, fostering a more systematic approach to tackle complex language-oriented tasks through reinforcement learning.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Rajkumar Ramamurthy (9 papers)
  2. Rafet Sifa (32 papers)
  3. Christian Bauckhage (55 papers)
Citations (5)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com