Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Do We Need to Compensate for Motion Distortion and Doppler Effects in Spinning Radar Navigation? (2011.03512v4)

Published 6 Nov 2020 in cs.RO and eess.SP

Abstract: In order to tackle the challenge of unfavorable weather conditions such as rain and snow, radar is being revisited as a parallel sensing modality to vision and lidar. Recent works have made tremendous progress in applying spinning radar to odometry and place recognition. However, these works have so far ignored the impact of motion distortion and Doppler effects on spinning-radar-based navigation, which may be significant in the self-driving car domain where speeds can be high. In this work, we demonstrate the effect of these distortions on radar odometry using the Oxford Radar RobotCar Dataset and metric localization using our own data-taking platform. We revisit a lightweight estimator that can recover the motion between a pair of radar scans while accounting for both effects. Our conclusion is that both motion distortion and the Doppler effect are significant in different aspects of spinning radar navigation, with the former more prominent than the latter. Code for this project can be found at: https://github.com/keenan-burnett/yeti_radar_odometry

Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that employing a lightweight MC-RANSAC estimator improves translational and rotational accuracy by compensating for motion distortions and Doppler effects.
  • The authors utilize robust feature extraction and noise-resistant descriptors validated on the Oxford Radar RobotCar Dataset to reliably align radar scans.
  • The research reveals that while Doppler effects have minimal impact on short-range odometry, their compensation is crucial for precise long-range localization in autonomous navigation.

Overview of "Do We Need to Compensate for Motion Distortion and Doppler Effects in Spinning Radar Navigation?"

The paper authored by Burnett et al. explores the impact of motion distortion and Doppler effects on spinning radar navigation systems, particularly in the domain of autonomous vehicles. Recognizing radar's robustness in adverse weather conditions compared to other sensing modalities like cameras and lidar, the authors conduct an investigation to determine whether these distortion effects are significant and if they can be effectively compensated for during radar-based navigation tasks.

Problem Context and Significance

Radar has re-emerged as a pivotal component in sensor suites for self-driving cars due to its capability to operate efficiently in inclement weather. The Navtech radar, which the authors focus on, offers 360-degree coverage and resolution that makes it advantageous for navigation, despite its susceptibility to motion distortion and Doppler frequency shifts. The interplay of these distortions and radar odometry/localization accuracy, especially at higher vehicle speeds, forms the crux of the investigation.

Methodological Approach

The authors present a dual-faceted analysis — employing both an estimator to correct motion distortion and a method to compensate for the Doppler effect. Central to their approach is a lightweight Motion-Compensated RANSAC (MC-RANSAC) estimator capable of recovering the relative motion between radar scans.

Key Methodological Insights:

  • Feature Extraction and Data Association: The work utilizes variants of the Cen et al. detectors for keypoint extraction, further refining the points through descriptors that are resistant to noise and rotational variances.
  • MC-RANSAC and Doppler Correction: A detailed derivation of MC-RANSAC illustrates how radar odometry is conducted while correcting for motion distortions by estimating consistent linear and angular velocities. The work demonstrates a computationally light method to adjust range measurements affected by Doppler shifts.

Experimental Outcomes

The research draws heavily on the Oxford Radar RobotCar Dataset, supplemented by proprietary data collection from the authors, to validate their findings.

  • Odometry Evaluation: A quantified comparison between rigid RANSAC and MC-RANSAC reveals that motion compensation moderately enhances translational and rotational accuracy. The Doppler effect, relatively negligible in the context of short-range odometry, becomes more impactful during longer navigational sequences or higher speeds.
  • Localization Accuracy: The localization trials present stronger evidence for the necessity of compensating both distortion types, demonstrating a marked improvement when both motion and Doppler effects are corrected.

Implications and Speculative Future Avenues

The findings indicate that while Doppler effects exert a minor role in short-term odometry, they assume greater importance in precise localization, particularly when navigating previously mapped routes in reverse. Compensating for these effects is not just feasible but essential for reliable radar-based navigation.

The paper lays groundwork for extending this exploration into full-fledged radar-based SLAM systems. Future research should investigate scalable estimators that can seamlessly integrate into larger autonomous systems, enhance robustness to dynamic obstacles, and leverage deep learning models for radar feature extraction.

In conclusion, Burnett et al. illustrate that while the need to compensate for radar distortion effects varies by application context, the advised methodology presents a relatively low overhead solution that can significantly bolster navigational accuracy in autonomous driving technologies.