Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Language-Conditioned Imitation Learning for Robot Manipulation Tasks (2010.12083v1)

Published 22 Oct 2020 in cs.RO, cs.CL, cs.CV, and cs.LG

Abstract: Imitation learning is a popular approach for teaching motor skills to robots. However, most approaches focus on extracting policy parameters from execution traces alone (i.e., motion trajectories and perceptual data). No adequate communication channel exists between the human expert and the robot to describe critical aspects of the task, such as the properties of the target object or the intended shape of the motion. Motivated by insights into the human teaching process, we introduce a method for incorporating unstructured natural language into imitation learning. At training time, the expert can provide demonstrations along with verbal descriptions in order to describe the underlying intent (e.g., "go to the large green bowl"). The training process then interrelates these two modalities to encode the correlations between language, perception, and motion. The resulting language-conditioned visuomotor policies can be conditioned at runtime on new human commands and instructions, which allows for more fine-grained control over the trained policies while also reducing situational ambiguity. We demonstrate in a set of simulation experiments how our approach can learn language-conditioned manipulation policies for a seven-degree-of-freedom robot arm and compare the results to a variety of alternative methods.

Language-Conditioned Imitation Learning for Robot Manipulation Tasks: An Overview

The paper "Language-Conditioned Imitation Learning for Robot Manipulation Tasks" introduces an innovative approach to teaching robots motor skills through imitation learning, enhanced by incorporating natural language instructions. Traditional imitation learning methods predominantly depend on execution traces such as motion trajectories and perceptual data, often lacking a communicative bridge between human intentions and robotic actions. This research addresses this gap by integrating unstructured natural language descriptions, thereby enriching the learning process with additional context beyond mere observation.

Methodology

Central to the proposed method is the Multimodal Policy Network (MPN), which seamlessly integrates language, visual input, and motion data into a cohesive policy model. The paper considers scenarios involving a seven-degree-of-freedom robotic arm tasked with various manipulation tasks in a simulated environment populated with diverse objects.

Key elements of the approach include:

  • Training Process: Demonstrators provide both kinesthetic guidance and verbal descriptions, which the model uses to learn correlations between language commands and corresponding motor actions.
  • End-to-End Model Design: The model comprises a high-level semantic network and a low-level controller:
    • The semantic network processes linguistic input and visual data to form a comprehensive goal representation.
    • The controller uses this representation to generate specific motor commands.

Attention mechanisms are employed to link language-specified goals with visual object identification, ensuring that the robot correctly interprets verbal instructions into physical actions. The policy is trained via supervised learning, utilizing auxiliary losses to optimize for aspects such as task completion accuracy, trajectory following, and object detection.

Experimental Evaluation

This approach was thoroughly validated in simulation environments with tasks requiring object manipulation. The main experiments demonstrated an average success rate of 84% in sequential tasks, such as picking and pouring objects, significantly outperforming existing baseline methods. A noteworthy aspect of the evaluation was the model's robustness and adaptability to novel commands and various perturbations, including linguistic, visual, and physical disruptions.

  • Task Performance: Success rates for picking and pouring tasks were 98% and 85%, respectively, highlighting the model's proficiency in executing complex, multi-step instructions.
  • Generalization: The model maintained reasonable performance when tested with unseen language instructions and varying environmental conditions, achieving a 64% success rate with free-form human instructions.
  • Ablations and Comparisons: Ablation studies revealed the crucial role of attention mechanisms and highlighted the complexity inherent in learning accurate language-conditioned policies. The model consistently outperformed baselines, emphasizing its superior integration of multimodal inputs.

Implications and Future Directions

From a theoretical standpoint, this research advances the conversation around multimodal learning by illustrating how language can serve as a flexible, robust component of policy training. Practically, this integration makes robot training more intuitive and adaptable, accommodating dynamic environments and real-time human interactions.

Looking ahead, the method’s adaptability signals a promising future for robotics applications, particularly in environments where human-robot collaboration is pivotal, such as in manufacturing and assistive technologies. Future developments could explore the integration of more advanced natural language processing models like BERT, which potentially further enhance the robot's understanding of diverse linguistic inputs.

This work not only lays the groundwork for making robots more responsive to human instructions but also opens new avenues in the design of interactive, autonomous systems capable of learning complex tasks with minimal human oversight. As such, it holds considerable promise for expanding the applicability of robotic systems in everyday contexts, enhancing their utility and ease of use.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Simon Stepputtis (38 papers)
  2. Joseph Campbell (36 papers)
  3. Mariano Phielipp (21 papers)
  4. Stefan Lee (62 papers)
  5. Chitta Baral (152 papers)
  6. Heni Ben Amor (43 papers)
Citations (172)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com