Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Studying Visualization Guidelines According to Grounded Theory (2010.09040v2)

Published 18 Oct 2020 in cs.HC and cs.GR

Abstract: Visualization guidelines, if defined properly, are invaluable to both practical applications and the theoretical foundation of visualization. In this paper, we present a collection of research activities for studying visualization guidelines according to Grounded Theory (GT). We used the discourses at VisGuides, which is an online discussion forum for visualization guidelines, as the main data source for enabling data-driven research processes as advocated by the grounded theory methodology. We devised a categorization scheme focusing on observing how visualization guidelines were featured in different threads and posts at VisGuides, and coded all 248 posts between September 27, 2017 (when VisGuides was first launched) and March 13, 2019. To complement manual categorization and coding, we used text analysis and visualization to help reveal patterns that may have been missed by the manual effort and summary statistics. To facilitate theoretical sampling and negative case analysis, we made an in-depth analysis of the 148 posts (with both questions and replies) related to a student assignment of a visualization course. Inspired by two discussion threads at VisGuides, we conducted two controlled empirical studies to collect further data to validate specific visualization guidelines. Through these activities guided by grounded theory, we have obtained some new findings about visualization guidelines.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (8)
  1. Alexandra Diehl (7 papers)
  2. Matthias Kraus (9 papers)
  3. Alfie Abdul-Rahman (13 papers)
  4. Mennatallah El-Assady (54 papers)
  5. Benjamin Bach (31 papers)
  6. Robert Steven Laramee (1 paper)
  7. Daniel Keim (19 papers)
  8. Min Chen (199 papers)
Citations (7)