Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Sensitivity and Specificity Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Detection of Pneumoperitoneum on Chest Radiographs (2010.08872v1)

Published 17 Oct 2020 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: Background: Deep learning has great potential to assist with detecting and triaging critical findings such as pneumoperitoneum on medical images. To be clinically useful, the performance of this technology still needs to be validated for generalizability across different types of imaging systems. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 1,287 chest X-ray images of patients who underwent initial chest radiography at 13 different hospitals between 2011 and 2019. The chest X-ray images were labelled independently by four radiologist experts as positive or negative for pneumoperitoneum. State-of-the-art deep learning models (ResNet101, InceptionV3, DenseNet161, and ResNeXt101) were trained on a subset of this dataset, and the automated classification performance was evaluated on the rest of the dataset by measuring the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for each model. Furthermore, the generalizability of these deep learning models was assessed by stratifying the test dataset according to the type of the utilized imaging systems. Results: All deep learning models performed well for identifying radiographs with pneumoperitoneum, while DenseNet161 achieved the highest AUC of 95.7%, Specificity of 89.9%, and Sensitivity of 91.6%. DenseNet161 model was able to accurately classify radiographs from different imaging systems (Accuracy: 90.8%), while it was trained on images captured from a specific imaging system from a single institution. This result suggests the generalizability of our model for learning salient features in chest X-ray images to detect pneumoperitoneum, independent of the imaging system.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Manu Goyal (18 papers)
  2. Judith Austin-Strohbehn (1 paper)
  3. Sean J. Sun (1 paper)
  4. Karen Rodriguez (2 papers)
  5. Jessica M. Sin (2 papers)
  6. Yvonne Y. Cheung (2 papers)
  7. Saeed Hassanpour (43 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.