Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Lucid Dreaming for Experience Replay: Refreshing Past States with the Current Policy (2009.13736v3)

Published 29 Sep 2020 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and stat.ML

Abstract: Experience replay (ER) improves the data efficiency of off-policy reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms by allowing an agent to store and reuse its past experiences in a replay buffer. While many techniques have been proposed to enhance ER by biasing how experiences are sampled from the buffer, thus far they have not considered strategies for refreshing experiences inside the buffer. In this work, we introduce Lucid Dreaming for Experience Replay (LiDER), a conceptually new framework that allows replay experiences to be refreshed by leveraging the agent's current policy. LiDER consists of three steps: First, LiDER moves an agent back to a past state. Second, from that state, LiDER then lets the agent execute a sequence of actions by following its current policy -- as if the agent were "dreaming" about the past and can try out different behaviors to encounter new experiences in the dream. Third, LiDER stores and reuses the new experience if it turned out better than what the agent previously experienced, i.e., to refresh its memories. LiDER is designed to be easily incorporated into off-policy, multi-worker RL algorithms that use ER; we present in this work a case study of applying LiDER to an actor-critic based algorithm. Results show LiDER consistently improves performance over the baseline in six Atari 2600 games. Our open-source implementation of LiDER and the data used to generate all plots in this work are available at github.com/duyunshu/lucid-dreaming-for-exp-replay.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Yunshu Du (5 papers)
  2. Garrett Warnell (47 papers)
  3. Assefaw Gebremedhin (6 papers)
  4. Peter Stone (184 papers)
  5. Matthew E. Taylor (69 papers)
Citations (9)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.