Bipartite Matching in Nearly-linear Time on Moderately Dense Graphs (2009.01802v2)
Abstract: We present an $\tilde O(m+n{1.5})$-time randomized algorithm for maximum cardinality bipartite matching and related problems (e.g. transshipment, negative-weight shortest paths, and optimal transport) on $m$-edge, $n$-node graphs. For maximum cardinality bipartite matching on moderately dense graphs, i.e. $m = \Omega(n{1.5})$, our algorithm runs in time nearly linear in the input size and constitutes the first improvement over the classic $O(m\sqrt{n})$-time [Dinic 1970; Hopcroft-Karp 1971; Karzanov 1973] and $\tilde O(n\omega)$-time algorithms Ibarra-Moran 1981; Mucha-Sankowski 2004. On sparser graphs, i.e. when $m = n{9/8 + \delta}$ for any constant $\delta>0$, our result improves upon the recent advances of [Madry 2013] and [Liu-Sidford 2020b, 2020a] which achieve an $\tilde O(m{4/3+o(1)})$ runtime. We obtain these results by combining and advancing recent lines of research in interior point methods (IPMs) and dynamic graph algorithms. First, we simplify and improve the IPM of [v.d.Brand-Lee-Sidford-Song 2020], providing a general primal-dual IPM framework and new sampling-based techniques for handling infeasibility induced by approximate linear system solvers. Second, we provide a simple sublinear-time algorithm for detecting and sampling high-energy edges in electric flows on expanders and show that when combined with recent advances in dynamic expander decompositions, this yields efficient data structures for maintaining the iterates of both [v.d.Brand et al.] and our new IPMs. Combining this general machinery yields a simpler $\tilde O(n \sqrt{m})$ time algorithm for matching based on the logarithmic barrier function, and our state-of-the-art $\tilde O(m+n{1.5})$ time algorithm for matching based on the [Lee-Sidford 2014] barrier (as regularized in [v.d.Brand et al.]).
- Jan van den Brand (27 papers)
- Yin-Tat Lee (3 papers)
- Danupon Nanongkai (68 papers)
- Richard Peng (87 papers)
- Thatchaphol Saranurak (77 papers)
- Aaron Sidford (122 papers)
- Zhao Song (253 papers)
- Di Wang (408 papers)