Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Review of Single-Source Deep Unsupervised Visual Domain Adaptation (2009.00155v3)

Published 1 Sep 2020 in cs.CV, cs.LG, and eess.IV

Abstract: Large-scale labeled training datasets have enabled deep neural networks to excel across a wide range of benchmark vision tasks. However, in many applications, it is prohibitively expensive and time-consuming to obtain large quantities of labeled data. To cope with limited labeled training data, many have attempted to directly apply models trained on a large-scale labeled source domain to another sparsely labeled or unlabeled target domain. Unfortunately, direct transfer across domains often performs poorly due to the presence of domain shift or dataset bias. Domain adaptation is a machine learning paradigm that aims to learn a model from a source domain that can perform well on a different (but related) target domain. In this paper, we review the latest single-source deep unsupervised domain adaptation methods focused on visual tasks and discuss new perspectives for future research. We begin with the definitions of different domain adaptation strategies and the descriptions of existing benchmark datasets. We then summarize and compare different categories of single-source unsupervised domain adaptation methods, including discrepancy-based methods, adversarial discriminative methods, adversarial generative methods, and self-supervision-based methods. Finally, we discuss future research directions with challenges and possible solutions.

An Expert Review of "Single-Source Deep Unsupervised Visual Domain Adaptation"

This paper provides a comprehensive review of the recent advances and methodologies employed in single-source deep unsupervised visual domain adaptation (DUDA). It critically evaluates the ways that machine learning is leveraged to mitigate domain shift between a labeled source domain and an unlabeled target domain, focusing primarily on visual tasks. The paper offers a structured examination of methods, categorizing them into discrepancy-based methods, adversarial discriminative models, adversarial generative models, and self-supervision-based methods.

Key Insights and Methodological Approaches

Discrepancy-Based Methods

Discrepancy-based approaches aim to explicitly measure and reduce the distance between distributions of source and target domains at various layers of the neural network. Techniques like Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) and Correlation Alignment (CORAL) have been effectively utilized to align marginal and joint distributions, thereby minimizing the domain discrepancy. Recent advancements, such as the introduction of higher-order moments alignment (HoMM) and contrastive adaptation networks (CAN), further refine these techniques by focusing on nuanced distribution characteristics and class-wise discrepancies.

Adversarial Discriminative Models

Adversarial discriminative models leverage the theoretical foundation provided by domain adversarial training, focusing on learning domain-invariant features by employing a discriminator to differentiate between domains. Techniques like Domain-Adversarial Neural Networks (DANN) and Conditional Domain Adversarial Networks (CDAN) have been instrumental, optimizing complex min-max objectives to align feature distributions. The paper highlights the efficacy of these models in capturing both marginal and conditional distributions across domains.

Adversarial Generative Models

The paper explores adversarial generative models which utilize Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to synthesize intermediate domain samples, addressing domain shifts at a pixel level. These methods, exemplified by CycleGAN and style transfer techniques, focus on transforming source domain representations to visually resemble the target domain. The potential of these methods is demonstrated through their application in tasks that require preserving semantic consistency across significant visual changes.

Self-Supervision-Based Methods

Approaches inspired by self-supervision focus on auxiliary tasks that enforce robust feature learning across domains. Novel strategies like image rotation prediction and jigsaw puzzle-solving provide auxiliary signals that guide the shared feature extractor to learn domain-agnostic representations. This paper identifies these methods as powerful tools for addressing domain shifts in more challenging, data-scarce scenarios.

Numerical Insights and Empirical Evaluations

The paper compares various methods using benchmark datasets such as Office-31, VisDA-2017, Cityscapes, and more, providing empirical evidence of the robustness and adaptability of each method class. It underscores the success of adversarial models, which often lead performance metrics in complex tasks like semantic segmentation and object detection, compared to other methodologies.

Implications and Future Directions

The survey concludes with a discussion on potential improvements and the applicability of these DUDA methods to different domains beyond computer vision, such as robotics and continual learning. It emphasizes the need for integrating multi-modal data, federated learning environments, and continual adaptation frameworks to handle dynamic real-world scenarios.

Looking forward, the paper speculates on promising avenues such as neural architecture search for DA, learning common sense for improved adaptation, and leveraging domain-specific priors to enhance adaptation robustness. As the field progresses, these perspectives are poised to transform DUDA applications, making adaptive systems more integrated with real-world applications.

Overall, this review is instrumental in providing researchers with a nuanced understanding of the challenges and successes in the field of single-source DUDA, paving the way for further innovation in addressing domain-related issues in machine learning.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (11)
  1. Sicheng Zhao (53 papers)
  2. Xiangyu Yue (93 papers)
  3. Shanghang Zhang (172 papers)
  4. Bo Li (1107 papers)
  5. Han Zhao (159 papers)
  6. Bichen Wu (52 papers)
  7. Ravi Krishna (6 papers)
  8. Joseph E. Gonzalez (167 papers)
  9. Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli (15 papers)
  10. Sanjit A. Seshia (105 papers)
  11. Kurt Keutzer (199 papers)
Citations (230)