Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Molecule Edit Graph Attention Network: Modeling Chemical Reactions as Sequences of Graph Edits (2006.15426v2)

Published 27 Jun 2020 in cs.LG, physics.chem-ph, and stat.ML

Abstract: The central challenge in automated synthesis planning is to be able to generate and predict outcomes of a diverse set of chemical reactions. In particular, in many cases, the most likely synthesis pathway cannot be applied due to additional constraints, which requires proposing alternative chemical reactions. With this in mind, we present Molecule Edit Graph Attention Network (MEGAN), an end-to-end encoder-decoder neural model. MEGAN is inspired by models that express a chemical reaction as a sequence of graph edits, akin to the arrow pushing formalism. We extend this model to retrosynthesis prediction (predicting substrates given the product of a chemical reaction) and scale it up to large datasets. We argue that representing the reaction as a sequence of edits enables MEGAN to efficiently explore the space of plausible chemical reactions, maintaining the flexibility of modeling the reaction in an end-to-end fashion, and achieving state-of-the-art accuracy in standard benchmarks. Code and trained models are made available online at https://github.com/molecule-one/megan.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (8)
Citations (121)

Summary

The paper presents a comprehensive end‐to‐end encoder–decoder framework that models chemical reactions as explicit sequences of graph edit actions. The key idea is to mimic chemists’ arrow‐pushing formalism by representing a reaction as a sequence of discrete modifications on a molecular graph. This strategy departs from standard sequence–to–sequence translation of SMILES strings by explicitly decomposing the reaction mechanism into interpretable graph edits.

The framework employs the following crucial design elements:

  • Input Graph Representation:

The molecular graph is encoded with one‐hot feature vectors for atoms and bonds. In addition to standard chemical features (atomic number, formal charge, chirality, explicit hydrogen count, aromaticity), the model augments the graph with a supernode that is connected to every atom via a special bond type. This supernode facilitates long-range interactions and proper propagation when the graph is segmented during reaction editing.

  • Output as a Sequence of Graph Actions:
    • EditAtom: Modify atomic properties (e.g., formal charge, chiral tag).
    • EditBond: Add, change, or delete bonds between atom pairs.
    • AddAtom: Introduce a new atom as a neighbor of an existing atom, with an associated bond type.
    • AddBenzene: Concisely append an entire benzene ring to a given carbon atom.
    • Stop: Terminate the reaction generation (restricted to the supernode).
    • This decomposition enables the model to sequentially “reason” about the underlying reaction center while naturally backtracking during beam search over plausible reaction pathways.
  • Model Architecture – Graph Attention Mechanism:

The encoder and decoder are implemented as variants of a graph convolutional network that integrates attention. In particular, the proposed GCN-att layer extends the standard Graph Attention Network by incorporating bond feature information during attention score computation. Concretely, the node features are first linearly projected, then concatenated with neighboring node features and corresponding bond features. This fused representation is passed through additional linear layers and nonlinearities (using ReLU activation) to compute attention coefficients that govern aggregation. The multi-head attention design (with hyperparameter K) allows the network to capture diverse structural subspaces efficiently.

  • Training via Gradient-Based Maximum Likelihood:

Instead of resorting to reinforcement learning, the method is trained end-to-end by backpropagating a maximum likelihood objective. To enable gradient computation over sequences of discrete actions, the authors define a fixed ordering over ground truth actions. They explore several ordering strategies (e.g., BFS with randomized tie-breaking versus DFS ordering) to decide the sequence in which modifications are applied. Their analysis, including ablation studies, indicates that the BFS rand-at approach optimizes the performance for retrosynthesis prediction, with performance gains of up to 4% in top-1 accuracy compared to alternative orderings.

  • Dynamic Graph Updates:

At each generation step, the current molecular graph is embedded and then processed by the decoder (augmented by maximum aggregation of previous hidden states) to generate logits for subsequent actions. This dynamic update enables the model to condition future predictions on prior modifications, thereby facilitating the exploration of diverse reaction pathways.

The empirical evaluation spans both retrosynthesis and forward synthesis tasks using standard benchmarks. Notable performance highlights include:

  • Retrosynthesis Prediction:

On the USPTO-50k dataset, the model achieves a competitive top-1 accuracy with state-of-the-art results for higher top-k values. For instance, when reaction type is provided, the reported top-10 and top-50 accuracies reach 91.6% and 95.3%, respectively. The high top-k accuracies underline the model’s ability to cover a broad reaction space, an advantage attributed to the explicit graph edit representation.

  • Scalability to Large Datasets:

The model is successfully scaled to a large USPTO-FULL dataset (with nearly 1 million reactions), demonstrating competitive performance in retrosynthesis tasks even as the complexity of reactions increases. This indicates that the sequential edit approach is robust across different dataset scales.

  • Forward Synthesis:

For forward prediction tasks (USPTO-MIT dataset), while the top-1 accuracy is slightly lower than that of Transformer-based baselines (testing at 89.3% on the separated variant), the model outperforms baselines in higher-k metrics. This suggests that the model’s ability to efficiently explore alternative reaction pathways confers an advantage when the output diversity is critical.

  • Interpretability and Error Analysis:

An error analysis on retrosynthesis predictions reveals that in nearly 80% of cases where the top prediction differs from the recorded ground truth, the proposed reaction is chemically reasonable upon expert review. The most common discrepancies concern chirality mispredictions. Such observations underscore both the interpretability and practical effectiveness of decomposing reactions into atomic and bond edits.

In summary, the paper makes a compelling case for modeling chemical reactions through a sequence of graph edits, providing a natural inductive bias that mirrors chemical intuition. The incorporation of a specialized graph attention mechanism, a carefully engineered action ordering scheme for training, and extensive empirical evaluation collectively demonstrate that this approach can yield high coverage and diverse predictions in both retrosynthesis and forward synthesis tasks. The work thus advances template-free reaction prediction with strong quantitative performance and enhanced interpretability relative to prevalent sequence-to-sequence models.