Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Minibatch vs Local SGD for Heterogeneous Distributed Learning (2006.04735v5)

Published 8 Jun 2020 in cs.LG, math.OC, and stat.ML

Abstract: We analyze Local SGD (aka parallel or federated SGD) and Minibatch SGD in the heterogeneous distributed setting, where each machine has access to stochastic gradient estimates for a different, machine-specific, convex objective; the goal is to optimize w.r.t. the average objective; and machines can only communicate intermittently. We argue that, (i) Minibatch SGD (even without acceleration) dominates all existing analysis of Local SGD in this setting, (ii) accelerated Minibatch SGD is optimal when the heterogeneity is high, and (iii) present the first upper bound for Local SGD that improves over Minibatch SGD in a non-homogeneous regime.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Blake Woodworth (30 papers)
  2. Kumar Kshitij Patel (11 papers)
  3. Nathan Srebro (145 papers)
Citations (186)

Summary

Analysis of Minibatch vs Local SGD in Heterogeneous Distributed Learning

The paper under review, authored by Woodworth, Patel, and Srebro, explores the comparative performance of Minibatch Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and Local SGD in the context of heterogeneous distributed learning. This exploration primarily targets distributed settings characterized by disparate local objectives across multiple devices and infrequent communication opportunities. The paper systematically evaluates the two methodologies in terms of convergence, computational cost, and scalability in such challenging scenarios.

Core Investigations and Claims

  1. Dominance of Minibatch SGD: The authors present a compelling argument that, in a heterogeneous environment where each machine optimizes a distinct convex objective, Minibatch SGD exhibits more favorable convergence properties than Local SGD. Even without employing acceleration techniques, Minibatch SGD outperforms existing analyses of Local SGD, highlighting its broader applicability and effectiveness.
  2. Accelerated Minibatch SGD: The accelerated variant of Minibatch SGD, known for its enhanced convergence rates, is put forth as optimal in scenarios of high heterogeneity. The authors substantiate this claim by establishing convergence bounds that remain independent of the heterogeneity parameter, ,demonstratingimmunitytoitsvariationsandreaffirmingitsrobustnessacrossdifferentsettingintensities.3.NovelBoundforLocalSGD:WhilepreviousanalysesfailedtodemonstratethesuperiorityofLocalSGDoverMinibatchSGDinheterogeneoussettings,thispaperintroducesthefirstupperboundproofthatshowcasesLocalSGDfindingpotencyinnearhomogeneousconditions.Thisresultisachievedbyintroducing, demonstrating immunity to its variations and reaffirming its robustness across different setting intensities. 3. **Novel Bound for Local SGD**: While previous analyses failed to demonstrate the superiority of Local SGD over Minibatch SGD in heterogeneous settings, this paper introduces the first upper-bound proof that showcases Local SGD finding potency in near-homogeneous conditions. This result is achieved by introducing \bar{\zeta}^2$, a measure of the global gradient variance, which helps delineate when Local SGD could surpass Minibatch SGD. ### Analytical Framework and Assumptions The authors underpin their analysis with comprehensive mathematical constructs, assuming $Hsmoothnessandboundedvarianceofstochasticgradients.Theheterogeneityindistributedsettingsisquantifiedbytheparameter-smoothness and bounded variance of stochastic gradients. The heterogeneity in distributed settings is quantified by the parameter, representing the variation in local gradients at the optimum. This precise formulation guides the theoretical comparisons and establishes the preeminence of Minibatch and Accelerated Minibatch SGD under typical distributed learning constraints.

An intriguing aspect explored is the dual-stepsize strategy (inner and outer stepsizes), which interpolates between Minibatch and Local SGD. Optimizing these stepsizes ensures that the resulting hybrid approach can adaptively bridge the two methodologies' strengths in certain regimes, although existing analyses do not conclusively determine superior performance over using Minibatch SGD optimally.

Implications and Future Directions

Practically, these insights underscore Minibatch SGD's suitability for large-scale distributed learning tasks, especially when data heterogeneity is pronounced and communication costs are significant. The paper adds to our understanding of the limitations of Local SGD, suggesting its utility is confined to environments with minimal data distribution variance.

Theoretically, the paper opens avenues for further research into novel algorithmic strategies that may harness the distributed setting's peculiarities. The concept of using additional measures, such as ζˉ2\bar{\zeta}^2, to provide more nuanced evaluations of distributed optimization methods could inspire new techniques capable of outperforming current methods in regimes of moderate heterogeneity.

Conclusion

This paper makes significant contributions to the discourse on distributed optimization methods by clarifying Minibatch SGD's relative strengths over Local SGD in heterogeneous settings. The results invite further exploration into advanced variants or entirely new methodologies that can navigate the complex landscape of distributed machine learning with varied local objectives. Although Accelerated Minibatch SGD emerges as the method of choice for high heterogeneity, the search for innovative solutions that can optimize across a broader spectrum continues to be a compelling direction for researchers.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com