Principles to Practices for Responsible AI: Closing the Gap (2006.04707v1)
Abstract: Companies have considered adoption of various high-level AI principles for responsible AI, but there is less clarity on how to implement these principles as organizational practices. This paper reviews the principles-to-practices gap. We outline five explanations for this gap ranging from a disciplinary divide to an overabundance of tools. In turn, we argue that an impact assessment framework which is broad, operationalizable, flexible, iterative, guided, and participatory is a promising approach to close the principles-to-practices gap. Finally, to help practitioners with applying these recommendations, we review a case study of AI's use in forest ecosystem restoration, demonstrating how an impact assessment framework can translate into effective and responsible AI practices.
- Daniel Schiff (1 paper)
- Bogdana Rakova (10 papers)
- Aladdin Ayesh (7 papers)
- Anat Fanti (1 paper)
- Michael Lennon (1 paper)