Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Greedy Scheduling: A Neural Network Method to Reduce Task Failure in Software Crowdsourcing (2006.01048v3)

Published 29 May 2020 in cs.DC, cs.HC, and cs.SE

Abstract: Context: Highly dynamic and competitive crowdsourcing software development (CSD) marketplaces may experience task failure due to unforeseen reasons, such as increased competition over shared supplier resources, or uncertainty associated with a dynamic worker supply. Existing analysis reveals an average task failure ratio of 15.7\% in software crowdsourcing markets. Goal: The objective of this study is to provide a task scheduling recommendation model for software crowdsourcing platforms in order to improve the success and efficiency of software crowdsourcing. Method: We propose a task scheduling method based on neural networks, and develop a system that can predict and analyze task failure probability upon arrival. More specifically, the model uses a range of input variables, including the number of open tasks in the platform, the average task similarity between arriving tasks and open tasks, the winner's monetary prize, and task duration, to predict the probability of task failure on the planned arrival date and two surplus days. This prediction will offer the recommended day associated with the lowest task failure probability to post the task. The proposed model is based on the workflow and data of Topcoder, one of the primary software crowdsourcing platforms. Results: We present a model that suggests the best recommended arrival dates for any task in the project with surplus of two days per task in the project. The model on average provided 4\% lower failure ratio per project.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Jordan Urbaczek (1 paper)
  2. Razieh Saremi (10 papers)
  3. Mostaan Lotfalian Saremi (3 papers)
  4. Julian Togelius (154 papers)
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.