Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Few-shot Compositional Font Generation with Dual Memory (2005.10510v2)

Published 21 May 2020 in cs.CV, cs.GR, and cs.LG

Abstract: Generating a new font library is a very labor-intensive and time-consuming job for glyph-rich scripts. Despite the remarkable success of existing font generation methods, they have significant drawbacks; they require a large number of reference images to generate a new font set, or they fail to capture detailed styles with only a few samples. In this paper, we focus on compositional scripts, a widely used letter system in the world, where each glyph can be decomposed by several components. By utilizing the compositionality of compositional scripts, we propose a novel font generation framework, named Dual Memory-augmented Font Generation Network (DM-Font), which enables us to generate a high-quality font library with only a few samples. We employ memory components and global-context awareness in the generator to take advantage of the compositionality. In the experiments on Korean-handwriting fonts and Thai-printing fonts, we observe that our method generates a significantly better quality of samples with faithful stylization compared to the state-of-the-art generation methods quantitatively and qualitatively. Source code is available at https://github.com/clovaai/dmfont.

An Exploration of Few-shot Compositional Font Generation with Dual Memory

The research paper titled "Few-shot Compositional Font Generation with Dual Memory" presents a sophisticated approach to addressing the multifaceted challenge of font generation—particularly for glyph-rich scripts like Korean, Thai, and Chinese, which contain thousands of distinct glyphs. The paper identifies the labor-intensive nature of traditional font generation and the limitations of existing automated methodologies, which often require large sample sizes and lengthy training processes. In response to these challenges, the authors propose a novel architecture, termed the Dual Memory-augmented Font Generation Network (DM-Font), which exploits the compositional nature of scripts to enable high-quality font generation from minimal sample sets.

Core Innovations and Methodology

The cornerstone of DM-Font lies in its dual memory architecture, which divides the process of font generation into global and local tasks. The persistent memory module captures the underlying structure of components in a font that remains constant across styles, while the dynamic memory module records the locally varying style features specific to a reference small set of glyphs. This bifurcated memory approach allows for the efficient synthesis of novel fonts by combining learned glyph structures with new stylistic information.

By employing a multi-head encoder and incorporating self-attention mechanisms, DM-Font adeptly manages the disassembly and reassembly of glyphs into their respective components—a process bolstered by the enhanced ability to interpolate and adapt components across different styles. The method excels particularly in maintaining the integrity of detailed styles with minimal supervision, as it only requires component labels, eschewing the need for exhaustive component bounding boxes or masks.

Evaluation and Results

The experimental results demonstrate DM-Font's superiority over existing few-shot font generation models, notably in Korean-handwriting and Thai-printing scenarios. The paper reports significant advancements in quantitative style awareness metrics such as perceptual distance and mean FID, attaining a style-aware accuracy of 62.6% on unseen Korean characters—far outstripping existing techniques. The model's strength lies in its ability to generalize to unobserved characters and styles, addressing the common issue of style overfitting seen in alternative approaches.

Qualitative evaluation further corroborates these findings. The generated fonts from DM-Font closely mimic the reference styles while maintaining high fidelity to the content—a challenge often unmet by baseline methods like AGIS-Net and FUNIT. User studies on unrefined handwriting data reinforce the model's effectiveness, where it consistently outperforms competitors in style, content, and overall preference.

Implications and Future Directions

The DM-Font model provides a substantial leap forward in automating font generation, rendering it a less resource-intensive task that now requires only a minimal set of glyphs—28 for Korean and 44 for Thai—to produce a comprehensive font library. Beyond the practical implications of reducing the cost and time associated with font design, this work contributes to theoretical discussions on few-shot learning by demonstrating the power of leveraging compositionality in complex domains.

Future research could explore extending the framework to non-complete compositional scripts like Chinese or applying it in other domains where compositional characteristics are prevalent, such as scene graph generation or attribute-conditioned image synthesis. Moreover, developing robust mechanisms to address situations with inherently ambiguous or polysemous component styles remains an open area for exploration.

Conclusion

The Dual Memory-augmented Font Generation Network offers a compelling methodology for few-shot font generation by artfully synthesizing global compositional rules with local stylization through its dual memory modules. Through comprehensive experiments and evaluations, this paper not only highlights the model's state-of-the-art performance but also sets the stage for further advancements in AI-driven design and creative processes. The open availability of the source code further encourages the adaptation and extension of these concepts across various glyph-rich scripts and beyond.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Junbum Cha (10 papers)
  2. Sanghyuk Chun (49 papers)
  3. Gayoung Lee (14 papers)
  4. Bado Lee (9 papers)
  5. Seonghyeon Kim (11 papers)
  6. Hwalsuk Lee (10 papers)
Citations (71)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com