Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
121 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
9 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The Local Star Formation Rate Surface Density And Metallicity Relation For Star-forming Galaxies (2005.10014v2)

Published 20 May 2020 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We study the relations between gas-phase metallicity ($Z$), local stellar mass surface density ($\Sigma_$), and the local star formation surface density ($\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$) in a sample of 1120 star-forming galaxies from the MaNGA survey. At fixed $\Sigma_{}$ the local metallicity increases as decreasing of $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ or vice versa for metallicity calibrators of N2 and O3N2. Alternatively, at fixed $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ metallicity increases as increasing of $\Sigma_{}$, but at high mass region, the trend is flatter. However, the dependence of metallicity on $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ is nearly disappeared for N2O2 and N2S2 calibrators. We investigate the local metallicity against $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ with different metallicity calibrators, and find negative/positive correlations depending on the choice of the calibrator. We demonstrate that the O32 ratio (or ionization parameter) is probably dependent on star formation rate at fixed local stellar mass surface density. Additional, the shape of $\Sigma_$ -- $Z$ -- $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ (FMR) depends on metallicity calibrator and stellar mass range. Since the large discrepancy between the empirical fitting-based (N2, O3N2) to electronic temperature metallicity and the photoionization model-dependent (N2O2, N2S2) metallicity calibrations, we conclude that the selection of metallicity calibration affects the existence of FMR on $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$.

Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.