Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Comparison Different Vessel Segmentation Methods in Automated Microaneurysms Detection in Retinal Images using Convolutional Neural Networks (2005.09097v1)

Published 18 Apr 2020 in physics.med-ph and eess.IV

Abstract: Image processing techniques provide important assistance to physicians and relieve their workload in different tasks. In particular, identifying objects of interest such as lesions and anatomical structures from the image is a challenging and iterative process that can be done by computerized approaches in a successful manner. Microaneurysms (MAs) detection is a crucial step in retinal image analysis algorithms. The goal of MAs detection is to find the progress and at last identification of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the retinal images. The objective of this study is to apply three retinal vessel segmentation methods, Laplacian-of-Gaussian (LoG), Canny edge detector, and Matched filter to compare results of MAs detection using a combination of unsupervised and supervised learning either in the normal images or in the presence of DR. The steps for the algorithm are as following: 1) Preprocessing and Enhancement, 2) vessel segmentation and masking, 3) MAs detection and Localization using a combination of Matching based approach and Convolutional Neural Networks. To evaluate the accuracy of our proposed method, we compared the output of our method with the ground truth that collected by ophthalmologists. By using the LoG vessel segmentation, our algorithm found a sensitivity of more than 85% in the detection of MAs for 100 color images in a local retinal database and 40 images of a public dataset (DRIVE). For the Canny vessel segmentation, our automated algorithm found a sensitivity of more than 80% in the detection of MAs for all 140 images of two databases. And lastly, using the Matched filter, our algorithm found a sensitivity of more than 87% in the detection of MAs in both local and DRIVE datasets.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Meysam Tavakoli (12 papers)
  2. Mahdieh Nazar (5 papers)
Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.